By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Almost every game announced on the direct comes to Xbox, just the zelda one maybe SE elliot one?

Purchases this week:

- Po'Ed

-Star Wars Dark Forces remaster 






Around the Network
konnichiwa said:

Almost every game announced on the direct comes to Xbox, just the zelda one maybe SE elliot one?

Purchases this week:

- Po'Ed

-Star Wars Dark Forces remaster 

So far so good on keeping their promise of increasing third party support. Primarily Japanese of course. Adventures of Elliot is confirmed to be on Xbox. I think Romancing Saga 2 remake is still a no show on Xbox since it got a Switch 2 edition.

I thought you had already purchased Dark Forces? Let me know how Po'ed is. I usually get all of Nightdive's games but that one and Killing Time were weird to me lol



You called down the thunder, now reap the whirlwind

Mnementh said:

Machiavellian said:

That is not winning because once the government gets involved then you see a slew of regulations start to drop and you cannot control all of it.  People think its easy to regulate governments and laws by corporations but its not.  Corporations never want anything regulated and I have never seen any corporations trying to get any laws passed for regulations.  If a law is passed they would want the least amount of regulation as possible because it never makes sense having to jump through a whole lot of hoops and red tape to get things done.

Big and established companies want regulations that make it harder for new and upcoming companies to compete. They sometimes work with lawmakers and often it is then some bureaucratic bullshit big companies can implement but that slows new ones down a lot.

True this can be the case but then would it not be better to just not involve the government period and just out price and lowball your competition out the market or deny them support from vendors and other services they would need to compete with your product.  Meaning which would be the easier method towards success.  Trying to bride multiple law makers hoping to get a bill through that would be obvious anti compete law which can easily be overturned or just use the good old standard play that most big corps have been doing for centuries.

Machiavellian said:

Also what corporations would want any of this age verification laws.  You would have to sell me on who does it actually benefit and what industry and why because for the life of me I cannot think of one.  All your data is already out there on the web and all the data you use to access anything is there for the picking without any need for some age verification. 

Yeah, that seems not in favor of any company. But it could work out for the bigger ones once they establish some verfification system, because again the new companies will face extreme risk with this law.

In this context every company faces risk with this age verification system.  In this case everyone will either have to develop something that conforms to the new rules or use 3rd party companies like is recommended in this rule which is a another cost to do business and a overhead that needs to be managed.

I guess to narrow down my point is that I hate to generalize anything because then it adds bias to our opinions and narrow the scope of our perception on things.  I just believe its very easy to say "Its the government and corporations out to control us" than to actually break down the situation and look at the pros and cons.  In this particular situation I cannot really see any real upside to this on a corporate front because nothing in this age verification helps any corporation that I can think of.  It sounds like more overhead they need to do and manage with no upside at all and a cost they have to account for.



Machiavellian said:
Tober said:

Because it's not just winning on one topic. The government wins because more control (a.k.a. we know best what is good for you). Corporations win because making money. implementing and sustaining a government mandate like this is not gratis. There is a business model here. And guess what. As a gamer you will be paying one way or the other.

That is not winning because once the government gets involved then you see a slew of regulations start to drop and you cannot control all of it.  People think its easy to regulate governments and laws by corporations but its not.  Corporations never want anything regulated and I have never seen any corporations trying to get any laws passed for regulations.  If a law is passed they would want the least amount of regulation as possible because it never makes sense having to jump through a whole lot of hoops and red tape to get things done.

Also what corporations would want any of this age verification laws.  You would have to sell me on who does it actually benefit and what industry and why because for the life of me I cannot think of one.  All your data is already out there on the web and all the data you use to access anything is there for the picking without any need for some age verification. 

Oh in this case I meant the corporation that is tasked with developing, implementing and running the age verification itself. I could have made that clearer.



G2ThaUNiT said:
konnichiwa said:

Almost every game announced on the direct comes to Xbox, just the zelda one maybe SE elliot one?

Purchases this week:

- Po'Ed

-Star Wars Dark Forces remaster 

I thought you had already purchased Dark Forces? Let me know how Po'ed is. I usually get all of Nightdive's games but that one and Killing Time were weird to me lol

Nah I thought SW Dark forces was too expensive but now it is on sale and while I wish it was cheaper I got it,  Don't know when I will test Po'ED tho,  my list of games is growing especially the one I havn't started yet.






Around the Network

I imagine this will be future GAAS titles likes Fairgames and Gummy Bear. At least starting.



You called down the thunder, now reap the whirlwind

G2ThaUNiT said:

I imagine this will be future GAAS titles likes Fairgames and Gummy Bear. At least starting.

GAAS makes the most sense to release on Xbox and Nintendo as they need as many players as possible. Not that releasing Concord on every platform would have made any difference for that game.

Until one is actually announced I wouldn't expect any single-player focused PlayStation games to release on Xbox or Nintendo. Lego Horizon I feel is more of an exception.



VGChartz Sales Analyst and Writer - William D'Angelo - I stream on Twitch and have my own YouTube channel discussing gaming sales and news. Follow me on Bluesky.

I post and adjust the VGChartz hardware estimates, with help from Machina.

Writer of the Sales Comparison | Monthly Hardware Breakdown Monthly Sales Analysis | Marketshare Features, as well as daily news on the Video Game Industry.

G2ThaUNiT said:

I imagine this will be future GAAS titles likes Fairgames and Gummy Bear. At least starting.

All the GaaS will come to Xbox, Fairgames especially needs to release on everything possible, Gummy Bears, etc. I think some smaller projects like LEGO Horizon could come to Xbox and then Spider-Man. I don't think we'll see God of War, Uncharted, etc. Sony's biggest SP IPs. But they'll be available on the Xbox PC so it's not that important.

It won't hurt PlayStation that much. They've already taken over the high-end console market and owned it since Xbox One and they will now continue to own it. They have tens of millions of users locked into their digital ecosystems now, with literally hundreds of games and other purchases, they won't just abandon literally hundreds-thousands of dollars spent.

The console market is far easier to get into, a lot cheaper and a lot less hassle than the PC market, until that changes they will continue to be tens of millions 'lazy' people who just want a simple plug in and play option and finally, there's nowadays tens of millions who buy these consoles only to play the blackhole games. I think it's safe to say that the biggest seller of Xbox/PlayStation consoles nowadays isn't exclusives, and hasn't been for a long time, it is by far things like Call of Duty, Fortnite, Sports Titles, etc.

Then you take a look at the play charts and it's these videogames dominating and it's incredibly difficult to crack the top 15 unless you're a huge IP or release into Game Pass/PS+ hence why they're have to release elsewhere and reach as wide an audience as possible because consoles are totally dominated by blackhole games.

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 31 July 2025

trunkswd said:
G2ThaUNiT said:

I imagine this will be future GAAS titles likes Fairgames and Gummy Bear. At least starting.

GAAS makes the most sense to release on Xbox and Nintendo as they need as many players as possible. Not that releasing Concord on every platform would have made any difference for that game.

Until one is actually announced I wouldn't expect any single-player focused PlayStation games to release on Xbox or Nintendo. Lego Horizon I feel is more of an exception.

I'm not expecting them to release any of their major SP titles on Xbox but I remember when the exception was that Sony doesn't own MLB so it doesn't count, then the exception was Bungie operates independently so it doesn't count, now the exception is Helldivers 2 is a GaaS so it doesn't count, Lol. There is also it doesn't count because it's only on Switch and not Xbox, Lol. It's pretty clear Sony is just slowly conditioning people into accepting more and more so who knows, I wouldn't say it's impossible, we live in strange times now.

Xbox fans went through the exact same denial

Last edited by Ryuu96 - on 31 July 2025

I'm throwing in Stellar Blade and Marvel Tokon as other most likely candidates.



You called down the thunder, now reap the whirlwind