ConservagameR said:
Was said by Louella Parsons over 50 years ago through the main stream media as a gossip columnist. Then the main stream continued with it. Fox started using it eventually like the rest of the media these days because it became the newest hit word again for a time. Unexpectedly from my point of view. I don't see how it makes sense from yours since you didn't get it. If I explained it was a joke right after the joke that would make it a terrible joke. It's also not clear that me explaining things is always good enough, as some tend to need much deeper detailed breakdowns. If the context doesn't make sense, you very well might have missed something. If you believe some people are bad based on poor reasoning, it's more likely you'll misinterpret what they're saying. You used, exactly, 3 times in your 4 short sentences when asking what I meant in your first reply. Sounded fairly serious to me. Not all jokes are funny, and while the audience usually gets the final say, if they didn't get the joke then they really don't have much say about it. |
First, I did not respond to your joke, I responded to your reply. You made a declaration statement on what the MSM is and isn't reporting which I was more interested in then your original statement. Then you seem to call that one a joke as well which as I stated, doesn't seem to be a joke and if it was, I did not get the context of it. You stated Bombshell news as if this context meant anything outside of whatever meaning you believe the words mean. I was trying to deduce which media actually used this statement from MSM which was the point you made within your post. As I stated, I did not see the connection since I have been following all MSM as well as other media sources on this topic. Thus contextually, what you consider a joke lack context to the topic we were talking about.
Like I said, most people who make jokes always believe someone gets it and if they do not there is a problem with that person. The joker never consider that the problem could also be the person making the joke. Your whole line appear to be, well you did not get the joke, so sucks to be you. Mine line is that your joke was neither funny, witty, cleaver and lacked imagination. Who is to say which person would be correct in this situation either way does it really matter. Its probably one of the reasons I rarely if ever tell jokes over text to strangers since I have no clue who I am talking to and whether or not they would understand if I am joking or not. Most jokes are contextual so they either hit or miss depending on the audience.
Also, how exactly can you tell if someone is serious when reading text. I always wondered why people make such comments. There really is no way for you to tell how someone is serious concerning a subject just by reading a text.
When you make a comment about relax as if you know me or know how I currently feel just makes me believe you are projecting your own emotions. You will never see those statements from me because I have no clue what you are feeling thus I will never guess on it. Text is way to impersonal to gleam anything more than a point either side is trying to get across.