| Darwinianevolution said: How do they know that women account for 41% of PS4/ PS5 ownership? Do they count whoever bought the console, or who lives in the house the console's in? What do they do when the console's owned by a family? |
I am guessing whoever is paying for stuff digitally.
Guess Mom's credit cards are counted?
Good growth on several areas... although I don`t like the increased investment on GAAS and are looking at their more PC releases to see if they will keep only putting gen old titles or will put current gen, if they do I`ll go PC only.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| Darwinianevolution said: How do they know that women account for 41% of PS4/ PS5 ownership? Do they count whoever bought the console, or who lives in the house the console's in? What do they do when the console's owned by a family? |
Well, they could be making some surveys... but more interesting is from where they took the PS1 data.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
It's interesting that they label PS4's tail-end as the strongest ever. This means that although they are seeing worst post successor hardware sales than PS3 and PS2, everything else that is in place makes up for that unit deficit (higher price of HW, PS+ subscriptions, big games still selling strongly on PS4).
Signature goes here!
DonFerrari said:
Well, they could be making some surveys... but more interesting is from where they took the PS1 data. |
Sure, but what are they basing their results on? All of the other data seem easily followable but that.
| eva01beserk said: I'm sure that digital is the one that's hurting them. I'm sure the majority of them are the disc version as to offest the loss of the digital. |
Yea, there is no way the BR drive costs them $100 (or even close), so they are taking quite a loss there and will do so for the foreseeable future. That said game sales on the DE are also higher revenue/profit per unit for Sony.
Darwinianevolution said:
Sure, but what are they basing their results on? All of the other data seem easily followable but that. |
I would say a very poor survey, like go to some stores and ask customers or see what they are buying and the like. Just like election pool survey.
Lafiel said:
Yea, there is no way the BR drive costs them $100 (or even close), so they are taking quite a loss there and will do so for the foreseeable future. That said game sales on the DE are also higher revenue/profit per unit for Sony. |
And they sell much more Physical editions than digital.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| DonFerrari said: Good growth on several areas... although I don`t like the increased investment on GAAS and are looking at their more PC releases to see if they will keep only putting gen old titles or will put current gen, if they do I`ll go PC only. |
Yep I'm hoping the PC trend continues. Could end up being my last Playstation console if so. I don't mind waiting a couple of years to play a game.
How are they being even so quick I wonder. Is it the volume at which they purchasing and or the combination of units and manufacture cost? Something must have happened to break even.
method114 said:
Yep I'm hoping the PC trend continues. Could end up being my last Playstation console if so. I don't mind waiting a couple of years to play a game. |
Couple vs 6 years is a big difference =p
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
