By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Darwinianevolution said:
DonFerrari said:

Well, they could be making some surveys... but more interesting is from where they took the PS1 data.

Sure, but what are they basing their results on? All of the other data seem easily followable but that.

I would say a very poor survey, like go to some stores and ask customers or see what they are buying and the like. Just like election pool survey.

Lafiel said:
eva01beserk said:

I'm sure that digital is the one that's hurting them. I'm sure the majority of them are the disc version as to offest the loss of the digital.

Yea, there is no way the BR drive costs them $100 (or even close), so they are taking quite a loss there and will do so for the foreseeable future. That said game sales on the DE are also higher revenue/profit per unit for Sony.

And they sell much more Physical editions than digital.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."