By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Cyberpunk 2077 Review Thread | 83 OC, 87 Meta

 

Predict which range Cyberpunk's meta score will fall in?

98-100 4 4.94%
 
95-97 5 6.17%
 
92-94 28 34.57%
 
89-91 21 25.93%
 
86-88 9 11.11%
 
83-85 5 6.17%
 
80-82 3 3.70%
 
Less than 80 6 7.41%
 
Undecided 0 0%
 
Total:81
Shaunodon said:
SvennoJ said:

What about it is the most ambitious?

Btw FS2020 came out this year, certainly that's the most ambitious we've ever seen.

If anything it feels more like the game is getting a pass (like FS2020 got) since it will get better or they expect the day one patch to fix most issues.

Not sure why you're trying to make this a 'my game vs. your game' battle, but I clearly wrote "one of the most ambitious...". And there's no disputing this is the 'biggest game of the year' in terms of hype/expectation, if you're arguing that.

And when I talk about ambition, I'm not just talking about pushing visual and technological limits. There's so much level of detail they were attempting to put into this game, including and beyond the technical aspect. If you don't already see that and want to drive the conversation back to Flight Sim and VR, more power to you, but I'm not interested in indulging you.

Oh it's definitely the biggest in hype and expectations.
However you called it the most ambitious we've ever seen, while literally just months ago the whole world was released by a studio with only 140 people ;)

Anyway attempting is the right word.



Around the Network

Damn, two new generations of gamers accept bugged games. How about don't accept them, then maybe, just maybe developers won't do it anymore. Why do I like others have accept others low standards to the point where developers know they can because gamers accept it.



I posted that I expected low 90’s, but I completely forgot about the shitty social justice nonsense that will bring the scores down. There are already reviews complaining about culture at CDPR and supposed transphobia being rampant in the game. Only a matter of time before dev crunch makes an appearance, if it hasn’t already.

It being at a 91 right now blows my mind. It must be really great.



Random_Matt said:

Damn, two new generations of gamers accept bugged games. How about don't accept them, then maybe, just maybe developers won't do it anymore. Why do I like others have accept others low standards to the point where developers know they can because gamers accept it.

It's too soon to say that the game is a buggy mess on launch when CD Projekt has not one, but two different day one patches, one of which is 43 GB. Many of the bugs that these early critics experienced may well be fixed in the two day one patches. Besides, most people know this game has already been delayed 3 times, and would rather see it released now, with bugs that will be patched out over time, than see it get delayed a 4th time.

You should know by now that critics aren't going to knock a ton of points off of a game simply because of bugs. Skyrim was buggy as hell on launch, to the point of being game breaking for some, and it got a 95 on metacritic and won 2011 Game of the Year against competition such as Arkham City, Zelda Skyward Sword, Portal 2, Deus Ex: Human Revolution, Witcher 2, and Uncharted 3. Even now, years later, Skyrim is still quite buggy unless you download the fan made bug fix mod. Sometimes a game is just so good that people can enjoy it in spite of bugs. At least CD Projekt fixes their bugs over time unlike Bethesda, Witcher 3 was quite buggy on release, but it was patched very well by them in the subsequent months after launch.

Last edited by shikamaru317 - on 07 December 2020

There is reviews already?



 

Around the Network
Random_Matt said:

Damn, two new generations of gamers accept bugged games. How about don't accept them, then maybe, just maybe developers won't do it anymore. Why do I like others have accept others low standards to the point where developers know they can because gamers accept it.

I agree that these huge amount of bugs should not be acceptable. But it's just the reality of modern game development. Digital stores need to be shut down first before it will become possible to get rid of these problems.



 

Random_Matt said:

Damn, two new generations of gamers accept bugged games. How about don't accept them, then maybe, just maybe developers won't do it anymore. Why do I like others have accept others low standards to the point where developers know they can because gamers accept it.

Because of you tube and people like this
"Personally I’d prefer to play it bugs and all rather than run the risk of having the game spoiled for me, which is what unfortunately happened with the TLOUP2."



this game has incredible bugs it smells foul tbh they only giving select reviewers codes and they are not allowed to use thier own footage. i think when all is done its not going to be as good as people hoped



...not much time to post anymore, used to be awesome on here really good fond memories from VGchartz...

PSN: Skeeuk - XBL: SkeeUK - PC: Skeeuk

really miss the VGCHARTZ of 2008 - 2013...

ClassicGamingWizzz said:

There is reviews already?

Yes, but I'd put my hand in a fire to guess that most of them aren't finished with the game but still posted a review nonetheless because they don't want to miss easy clicks ;)

Though kind of evident when you can also look at the numerous pending reviews.



Switch Friend Code : 3905-6122-2909 

Skeeuk said:

this game has incredible bugs it smells foul tbh they only giving select reviewers codes and they are not allowed to use thier own footage. i think when all is done its not going to be as good as people hoped

In other words, we only have a small budget to pay off a select few. Then it can sell like hot cakes before the truth comes out via the majority. (I'm just messing, but you never know)