As a matter of fact, it turns out she faked her "therapist" notes. As in, they're her own notes:

So a habitual liar who's been proven to be lying isi caught faking therapist notes? Didn't see THAT coming.

Yeah, but it's not lying or falsified evidence if she believed the therapist wrote the notes as Amber herself was writing the notes pretending to be written by the therapist though, right?

Kotaku now simping for Amber:

They mimmicked in no uncertain terms Amber's words of the US verdict setting back women and scaring victims from coming forward with abuse claims (whatever the hell that means, many male victims have since come forward since they no longer have to fear doing so). 

They even brought up the UK verdict, ugh. Almost like there's a massive difference between a sane jury of your peers unanimously finding for you as opposed to this:

Kotaku will write any garbage just for the clicks. All morals and common sense go out of the window there.

People are beginning to learn that harassment and abuse aren't primarily driven by gender, sexuality, or political inclination. The key factor is power and the confidence that the abuser is in a secure position.

For instance, this interesting case: "IGDA Women in Games Special Interest Group chair and IGDA Foundation Next Gen Leaders alumna Jennifer Scheurle stepped down from her position at the IGDA of her own accord following accusations of manipulation, harassment and emotional abuse."

What makes his case stand out isn't just that the accused is female or that she is an activist who supports the "believe all women" mantra, it's also important because the IGDA attempted to completely bury the allegations.  In short, some of the loudest critics of toxic behavior in the gaming community are now accused of the very same things.

This is what happens when people reach a position where they are confident they can do what they want without meaningful repercussions.

What we are starting to see now, with regards to the MeToo movement, is that some women believe that simply being female gives them that power--and in some cases, they're right.  One of the co-workers that harassed me actually said, "we're female, all we have to do is cry and they'll believe us."  She was secure in the power she held so she felt free to act on it.

The media is also an important factor in all this, as they clearly pick who they target and who they support based on their own agenda.  Individuals as prominent as Jennifer Scheurle being accused, along with the subsequent allegations of a cover-up, should probably equate to a big deal but it doesn't look like the publications who make the most noise about "cleaning up the industry" have given this the coverage you might imagine.  I think it's obvious that sites like Kotaku and Polygon believe the continuation of their agenda is more important than the truth.  They will knowingly enable abuse and harassment in situations where fighting against it compromises their political position.  For all their smug righteousness, they're no better than the people they claim to work against.

I'm pretty sure that the only reason this came to light at all was that her accuser was female.  Otherwise, she'd still be untouchable.  Not that all that much damage has been done--she doesn't seem to have been "Cancelled" or especially hurt by the allegations, amazingly enough.

ANYONE can be a victim, ANYONE can be an abuser.  Those who claim to be on the side of the victim but are ONLY on the side of the victim when it's politically convenient are complete hypocrites.  

People are beginning to learn that harassment and abuse aren't primarily driven by gender, sexuality, or political inclination. The key factor is power and the confidence that the abuser is in a secure position.

For instance, this interesting case: "IGDA Women in Games Special Interest Group chair and IGDA Foundation Next Gen Leaders alumna Jennifer Scheurle stepped down from her position at the IGDA of her own accord following accusations of manipulation, harassment and emotional abuse."

What makes his case stand out isn't just that the accused is female or that she is an activist who supports the "believe all women" mantra, it's also important because the IGDA attempted to completely bury the allegations.  In short, some of the loudest critics of toxic behavior in the gaming community are now accused of the very same things.

This is what happens when people reach a position where they are confident they can do what they want without meaningful repercussions.

What we are starting to see now, with regards to the MeToo movement, is that some women believe that simply being female gives them that power--and in some cases, they're right.  One of the co-workers that harassed me actually said, "we're female, all we have to do is cry and they'll believe us."  She was secure in the power she held so she felt free to act on it.

The media is also an important factor in all this, as they clearly pick who they target and who they support based on their own agenda.  Individuals as prominent as Jennifer Scheurle being accused, along with the subsequent allegations of a cover-up, should probably equate to a big deal but it doesn't look like the publications who make the most noise about "cleaning up the industry" have given this the coverage you might imagine.  I think it's obvious that sites like Kotaku and Polygohttps://thedirect.com/article/marvel-christian-bale-joiningn believe the continuation of their agenda is more important than the truth.  They will knowingly enable abuse and harassment in situations where fighting against it compromises their political position.  For all their smug righteousness, they're no better than the people they claim to work against.

I'm pretty sure that the only reason this came to light at all was that her accuser was female.  Otherwise, she'd still be untouchable.  Not that all that much damage has been done--she doesn't seem to have been "Cancelled" or especially hurt by the allegations, amazingly enough.

ANYONE can be a victim, ANYONE can be an abuser.  Those who claim to be on the side of the victim but are ONLY on the side of the victim when it's politically convenient are complete hypocrites.