By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Unreal 5 Demo vs Series X Reveal

 

Which event got you more impressed?

Xbox Series X Gameplay Event 25 27.17%
 
Unreal Engine 5 PS5 Demo 67 72.83%
 
Total:92
HollyGamer on 16 May 2020
Oneeee-Chan!!! said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Well a 2080 is faster than a 5700 XT and yea RDNA2 will be faster than RDNA1.

5700 XT = 40 CU. PS5 = 36 CU but PS5 will be faster with less CU than 5700 XT with more CU.

But a 2080 is a good amount faster than 5700 XT. You would need the Series X to match/beat that performance in GPU. But we won't know for sure until we see more games/engines.

And the person I linked is just verifying what reddit said is correct.

I don't know why you compare the RTX2080 with the 5700XT.
It should be mobile 2080.
The PS5 GPU has a 10.3TF performance because the clock is very high.
Even at 36CU, it is more powerful than the 5700XT.

The Video is HOAX, 



Around the Network
DonFerrari on 16 May 2020
HollyGamer said:
Oneeee-Chan!!! said:

I don't know why you compare the RTX2080 with the 5700XT.
It should be mobile 2080.
The PS5 GPU has a 10.3TF performance because the clock is very high.
Even at 36CU, it is more powerful than the 5700XT.

The Video is HOAX, 

I guess that he is less credible than unkwon random china employee.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

HollyGamer on 16 May 2020
Captain_Yuri said:
Oneeee-Chan!!! said:

I don't know why you compare the RTX2080 with the 5700XT.
It should be mobile 2080.
The PS5 GPU has a 10.3TF performance because the clock is very high.
Even at 36CU, it is more powerful than the 5700XT.

Yea mobile 2080 is good amount faster than 5700 xt...

And yea, I said the ps5 is faster than 5700 XT even though the ps5 is 36 CU...

Which is why it's not connect.

2080 desktop is faster then 5700 XT in some games (most of the times actually) but not the Mobile variant.

2080 Max Q is the mobile variant that underclock heavy and match the performance of RTX 2060 

PS5 >>> RTX 2060

claiming it can run better then PS5 demo is just straight lie 

 



Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 16 May 2020
HollyGamer said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Yea mobile 2080 is good amount faster than 5700 xt...

And yea, I said the ps5 is faster than 5700 XT even though the ps5 is 36 CU...

Which is why it's not connect.

2080 desktop is faster then 5700 XT in some games (most of the times actually) but not the Mobile variant.

2080 Max Q is the mobile variant that underclock heavy and match the performance of RTX 2060 

PS5 >>> RTX 2060

claiming it can run better then PS5 demo is just straight lie 

 

The original translation didn't mention Max Q but instead said 2080 mobile which is different. If it said Max Q, I would have said otherwise.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

HollyGamer on 17 May 2020
Captain_Yuri said:
HollyGamer said:

Which is why it's not connect.

2080 desktop is faster then 5700 XT in some games (most of the times actually) but not the Mobile variant.

2080 Max Q is the mobile variant that underclock heavy and match the performance of RTX 2060 

PS5 >>> RTX 2060

claiming it can run better then PS5 demo is just straight lie 

 

The original translation didn't mention Max Q but instead said 2080 mobile which is different. If it said Max Q, I would have said otherwise.

STill related, a mobile version always  inferior to desktop variant. If it has the same performance your Laptop will only able to run for 5 minute LOL. 

EDIT: BTW I am not saying you lying, I am referring to the Chinese guy from the Reddit that claim Unreal Engine 5 demo  run on Laptop GPU. 



Around the Network
Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 17 May 2020
HollyGamer said:
Captain_Yuri said:

The original translation didn't mention Max Q but instead said 2080 mobile which is different. If it said Max Q, I would have said otherwise.

STill related, a mobile version always  inferior to desktop variant. If it has the same performance your Laptop will only able to run for 5 minute LOL. 

Correct but it is still generally as fast as the 2070 Super Desktop which is faster than 5700XT.



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

HollyGamer on 17 May 2020
Captain_Yuri said:
HollyGamer said:

STill related, a mobile version always  inferior to desktop variant. If it has the same performance your Laptop will only able to run for 5 minute LOL. 

Correct but it is still generally as fast as the 2070 Super Desktop which is faster than 5700XT.

No 

2080 mobile either "super" variant or normal variant it's still using the same 2080 variant that clocked slower.  

Even on desktop, the 2080 super is just slightly faster than the 2080 standard. 



Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 17 May 2020
HollyGamer said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Correct but it is still generally as fast as the 2070 Super Desktop which is faster than 5700XT.

No 

2080 mobile either "super" variant or normal variant it's still using the same 2080 variant that clocked slower.  

Even on desktop, the 2080 super is just slightly faster than the 2080 standard. 

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Alienware-Area-51m-i9-9900K-RTX-2080-Laptop-Review.414667.0.html#toc-case



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

HollyGamer on 17 May 2020
Captain_Yuri said:
HollyGamer said:

No 

2080 mobile either "super" variant or normal variant it's still using the same 2080 variant that clocked slower.  

Even on desktop, the 2080 super is just slightly faster than the 2080 standard. 

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Alienware-Area-51m-i9-9900K-RTX-2080-Laptop-Review.414667.0.html#toc-case

That Laptop are using RTX Desktop GPU  variant check the preview for the laptop. 

https://www.techradar.com/reviews/alienware-area-51m-review

"  In fact, the desktop-class socketed components make the Alienware Area-51m a prodigious value, compared to competing laptops like the MSI GT75 Titan. MSI’s desktop replacement will set you back $4,199 (about £3,150, AU$5,900) at the top end, with weaker laptop hardware, and without the possibility of future upgrades "

Last edited by HollyGamer - on 17 May 2020

Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 17 May 2020
HollyGamer said:
Captain_Yuri said:

https://www.notebookcheck.net/Alienware-Area-51m-i9-9900K-RTX-2080-Laptop-Review.414667.0.html#toc-case

That Laptop are using RTX Desktop GPU  variant check the preview for the laptop. 

Link or show the picture cause I am blind



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850