Ok I see. It is indeed a privileges and immunities claim, but it's also a fourteenth amendment issue. 

Where I screwed up is that I forgot that the 14th Amendment also has a privileges and immunity clause. But, in my defense, I'm pretty sure that when the issue is state or municipal residence, that is typically considered an issue under the article IV clause. I'm guessing that they couldn't use that here because they are dealing with a federal right, and not a state right. 

Their 14th Amendment claim, as I understand it, is that even though everyone in PA could request an absentee ballot, the process was handled differently in different counties, so not all citizens have the same rights. Also, they're making a claim that by allowing a process that, according to them, leads to a chance of fraud, the privilege of voting is violated. Then there's also a 14th Amendment due process claim that because fraudulent votes may have been allowed in, that effectively strips voters of the right "to vote without the taint of fraud or intimidation".

Essentially the argument is that certain counties may have done things improperly with mail in voting, and maybe that allowed fraudulent votes, and because of that, everyone's vote becomes suspect, and that's unfair to all the people who voted non fraudulently.

To put it more succinctly, they are manufacturing suspicion of fraud, and then complaining that the people were deprived of the right to vote without suspicion of fraud. That's an impressive display of mental gymnastics. Look at around 156 for the 14th amendment conversation.

Of course, it's a nonsensical argument. The Courts are not going to invalidate thousands of votes with no evidence of fraud. And they're not going to literally disenfranchise 700K people because the rest of the voters may be tainted by potential fraud. There would also be the issue of why this claim was not brought in a more timely manner. And, that mail in voting has been around for 100+ years and been considered constitutional. 

Trump was reportedly upset that he didn't have a dream team of lawyers like Bush did in 2000, but there's a reason for that... Bush had an actual case. 

I haven't checked Trump's twitter for over 12 hours. Is the election still rigged?

Since Trump won't admit defeat until Hell freezes over I think that's pretty good news for the Satanist Biden supporters.

His lesson was a bit different.

"If you say something and it doesn't become true, you're not saying it often enough. If it still hasn't come true you should probably sue."

The fact that Trump is trying to undermine our democracy is just further proof that he is not fit to be president.

I expected this from Trump. I did not expect that the rest of the party was so far gone. 

Us libtard cucks have been saying that since 2015 when he started gaining steam. We've known it since before he ran for office, and we've been repeating it daily ever since...Trust me, anyone who has two eyes and just as many neurons to rub together for a spark of thought knew this to be the case. 

Well if you think about it, I see why they are still falling in line.  Currently President Trump is sitting at 72 Million votes which is still a damn lot of people.  If he was way lower than that they would have bailed in a heartbeat but with that number they feel he still has use.  A lot of them believe they can still squeeze that golden goose for as much and as long as possible and if you think about it they are probably right.  Even though Biden won, there wasn't this big blue wave that was going to give Dems the Senate and secure the house like they thought.  The Dems have a long way to go and there are a number of issues they have not realize why they are still on shaky grounds with a large segment of Americans.  Maybe Joe and some Dems need to do that old patriot thing where you huge the flag and go all Pro America.  This is what basically has kept Trump going, this belief that he cares about the us even though his policies only appear to be for the lower income class.  Even though nothing really has changed for lower income people, he has given them that feel good feeling of US first and US is the greatest.  I have to give him props for understanding this basic principle.  People care more about the illusion then they do the reality.

Case in point would be a few interviews I have seen where people on the streets were critical of the ACA but did not know they were using it and not only that but the inclusions of items within the ACA helped them with maintaining and keeping their health insurance based on previous medical conditions.  Ignorance is a very strong tool in controlling people and both sides do it well but seems to me Reps have mastered the art way better than Dems.

Meh, I’d would say his lesson was probably more like this.

if you say something and it doesn’t become true, throw money at it until it is true.

Call me crazy but I thought they at least had some small shred of integrity left. Not much, but enough that they wouldn't try to blatantly undermine democracy.