Snoorlax said: - Where does it say "we will stop focusing on casuals?" Nowhere, the answer is that they tried to focus and please both audiences at the same time like i've been saying the whole time. - What core games in 2015? You mean Devil's Third or Mario Party 10? I'm talking about 3rd party core games and the shift that happened after the first year, yeah that's what i was saying genius. Seems like it's getting too much for you now. - No, you showed me Sony and Ms's billion dollar losses without any context and i countered that so now you've got nothing new to add, repeat most of what i already said and you fall back on Nintendo's business model. - Yeah, just like i thought, no real answer just keep argueing for the sake of argueing. And yeah i've proved you multiple times now that Wii U was named and sold based on Wii's success but not with a more personal experience in mind like you claim, but with the casual audience took you long enough to understand it. |
- Again this part is of your own thinking saying they're aiming at cores doesn't mean I said solely at cores it means that's the main audience they want to bring in after they assumed the blue ocean would migrate over by default.
- You don't understand what "up to" means? It means from launch up to the end of 2014 they still had those games on board the shift came before those games stopped arriving the shift happened at the end of 2013 because the blue ocean didn't follow through.
- No the context was the it was even explained why those figures were being shown to you because those losses show the type of costs that approach entails meaning the 10bn you touted that's in the bank means nothing with such costs, fact that you think business model was something to fall back on when it was always part of the point and equation is highlighting you either didn't read anything or don't really understand how business operates as business model is a key factor in a company's finances you can't even open up a company bank account with out one being presented to the bank so they know where the money is coming from and going.
- Except the is an answer and the is objective proof in the form of well you know GC and GBA linking up with games utilizing it, notice how you have now counter to this and side step with a red herring like your claim of proof which was debunks ages ago.