| ckmlb said: @Fksumot: It's clear to me, events important to me are important. Not personally important means unimportant. |
Sure. Relativism. Man is the measure of all things. You picked a very arbitrary incident to make an unimportant point. Or was your point important? And if so, what was important? It's your personal viewpoint, so I guess you thought it was important. But there's no reason that should mean anything to anyone else, is there? There are no absolutes. We go over this every time there's a discussion about review scores.
You can see things around you, they don't affect you, not personally important. Doesn't matter what it is.
Stub your toe and it hurts a lot, personally important.
Anyone can understand that viewpoint and everyone has had some experience with that type of thinking. Having a relative moral code is not very interesting since you have to argue that everyone has a relative moral code, there can be no absolutes. Or you can just retreat into solipsism.
What a person actually thinks is important or unimportant is what guides their actions. You thought it was important to make a thread about a fortune cookie. The cookie was wrong if you can pick and choose though, because you could choose the "personally unimportant" option every time. If you can't pick then there's something you don't control that determines what is personally important to you and what is not.
In a certain type of relativism there's no accountability but that doesn't seem to be your brand of relativism. Do you think something is wrong because it is a priori "wrong" or is something wrong just because at the moment you think it's wrong? You can stick any qualifier in your important/unimportant viewpoint and it remains just as valid.

















