By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - NSFW Discussion - Close This, @#$% It

CaptainExplosion said:
COKTOE said:

Not sure if serious, but just in case...You're going to be fine. Rellaaaaxx dude.

I'm serious about her being a minor if that's also what you're wondering.

I believe you. It was just one drawing on Deviant Art though. You are facing literally zero repercussions for viewing it.



- "If you have the heart of a true winner, you can always get more pissed off than some other asshole."

Around the Network

This is a high quality first world problem.



CaptainExplosion said:
ARamdomGamer said:
This is a high quality first world problem.

Why don't you look at it and see how it makes you feel?

If you want I could see it, a drawing won't make me flinch, because is just that, a drawing.



Ganoncrotch said:

So a guy made up a character, drew her camel toe and said the character he made up was as minor?

You know here in Ireland they're trying to find names and id the kids from a mass grave which had 800 bodies in it but the church won't hand up records. Kinda puts things like this in context for me tbh.


(.) (.) - Those brackets are belong to a 12 year old stick figure that I'm holding hostage in my imagination! When you figure out Which things in life really hurt kids you'll see that the biggest offenders don't have followers on deviant art but masses of.... Masses.

What was their reasoning for not giving the records?

sundin13 said:
They are coming for you. Better throw out your computer while you still have time.

It's too late for that.  At this point, I think he needs to burn down his house and start a new life miles away.



This is a high quality furry world problem.



Around the Network
CaptainExplosion said:
Zkuq said:
Why do you care? If it's just drawings etc., no one got hurt. You don't have to like it but I don't see much reason to do anything about it - unless maybe if it's illegal where you live, in which case it might still be a battle you can't win because we're talking about the internet here.

I care because of the pain done to child molestation victims by people who'd do this sort of picture with real children.

RolStoppable said:

Why would I?

If I stopped playing Nintendo games altogether because some character designs in Xenoblade Chronicles 2 are too sexualized, I'd hope that you say that makes no sense, because oversexualisation in one piece of work doesn't suddenly make all games detestable.

The thing is the sexier characters in Xenoblade Chronicles 2 aren't under 18, and it's not about the games' content it's about someone's fanart.

Obeying the law is typically the smart thing to do.  What if the legal age were 27?



Well first of all I think that lolicon being illegal is pretty stupid assuming that there is no harm done to anybody (which there have been, iirc there was a famous lolicon artist in Japan who was found to be tracing pictures of real child porn in his lolicon drawings). It's an incredibly touchy subject and I'd rather not lean too far one way or another but at the end of the day it's a fetish in the form of a drawing, I don't think there should be much of a problem. 

Second of all you aren't going to go to jail for it even though it is technically illegal in Canada. If Canadian authorities spent all their time spying on what people were looking at in their homes they'd be arresting people for similar charges constantly - and as far as I can tell only two people have ever been arrested in Canada for lolicon art. Think about how much manpower and how much of a big operation it would be for governments to not just monitor all of the content you're looking at, but also act upon it. I've even heard before that the method of "monitoring" that authorities use is not as overbearing as we may think, or that the way in which internet sites are tracked is not as specific as we think, but that's for people smarter than me to explain (and very well could be wrong). 

As for your final worry, I don't know, that's totally up to you. I'd like to think that separating the art from the artist is easy to do for myself personally, but considering you're implying enjoying his other art work, this could be especially hard ... since you're enjoying lewd artwork from someone that has made lewd artwork you find objectionable. All I'll say is that you'll have to think about this yourself and come to your own conclusion, because people aren't always going to be there to make conclusions for you when you find something objectionable in life. 



This thread should be moved to General Discussion, as the actual main topic ended quite tame.



I love that op was super worried about looking at it regarding getting into trouble yet twice in this thread has offered to redistribute the images.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Ganoncrotch said:
I love that op was super worried about looking at it regarding getting into trouble yet twice in this thread has offered to redistribute the images.

Lmao, that's a good point. I didn't think of that. Maybe he is actually the artist and just looking for some publicity : o