John2290 said: Oh Lord, Slant Magazine with a 40 on MC. Someone got there ass wooped and got salty cause in no world is this game a 40 or a 2 out of 5. Slant, classy as ever. |
Yep. Slant blows. Just a little snippet from disqus on this topic...
This review reads like it was written by a person who did not finish the game, nor indeed, get very far into it at all. It is extremely vague and non-detailed and simply restates commonly known facts about the game in the most generic way possible. For example, the review says "the items are hardly inventive: axe, spear, flamethrower, shuriken", ignoring the plethora of interesting and unique prosthetics the player unlocks throughout the game, as if those very early items were the only one the reviewer unlocked (or learned about through previews and other reviews).
The notion that there is "little in Sekiro to make it stand out in a vast ocean of releases" is absurd; the game features plenty of gorgeous imagery, beautiful music, smooth responsive gameplay, challenging, dramatic, and epic boss fights, and lots of secrets to discover. It subverts classic Japanese mythology in intriguing ways and features unforgettable locations, enemy designs, and moments.
I challenge the reviewer to do better next time and finish the game they are reviewing, or at least get far enough into it to meet it on its own terms. This review does a disservice to From Software, fans of the series, and Slant as a publication.
P.S. It is a common practice when reviewing games to state whether or not the reviewer finished the game, how many hours they spent on it, etc. This helps readers understand whether the reviewer's knowledge of the game is comprehensive.
Last edited by Cerebralbore101 - on 27 March 2019