Jumpin said:
So you think they're lying about their own opinion? Can you prove that? |
His very paragraphs proves it, as he says few words later that ...
While I’ll admit that I initially rolled my eyes at yet another Gruff White Male Protagonist™ in a grim world - especially one with such a Gruff White Male Protagonist™-ey name as Deacon St. John - I ended up getting far more invested than I’d initially expected. I shouldn’t be surprised, I suppose - this is a first-party Sony title, and Bend is no stranger to writing around well-developed characters and games with a strong narrative focus, either
Basically he assumed something bad because he is a gruff white male protagonist, with a name that aggravates it. Then he confess the chars is well developed and have a strong narrative.
It would be very different situation if he had something like "the char have no development besides being a gruff white male" and criticizing the lack of development. And even in this case being a white male is inconsequential as that have nothing to do with development of char. He would basically be complaining that the char have a single trait that is being gruff.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







