Intrinsic said:
I think you both are missing something |
https://venturebeat.com/2018/12/18/november-2018-npd-nintendo-switch-outsells-everything/
What are we missing? Or what am I missing, to be more accurate?
Intrinsic said:
I think you both are missing something |
https://venturebeat.com/2018/12/18/november-2018-npd-nintendo-switch-outsells-everything/
What are we missing? Or what am I missing, to be more accurate?
super_etecoon said:
https://venturebeat.com/2018/12/18/november-2018-npd-nintendo-switch-outsells-everything/ What are we missing? Or what am I missing, to be more accurate? |
That is in revenue which was already discussed. It made the most money but did not sell the most consoles.
The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...
PSN: StlUzumaki23
TheBlackNaruto said:
That is in revenue which was already discussed. It made the most money but did not sell the most consoles. |
Oh...gotcha, thanks. So what are the final numbers?
super_etecoon said:
Oh...gotcha, thanks. So what are the final numbers? |
Rounded
PS4-1.47m
NSW-1.36m
XBO-1.34m
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.
Mario Odyssey didn't even crack top 20, but Just Dance 19, did? That's really surprising to see...
Intrinsic said:
All true. But none of that will happen if what I think will happen happens. Its something nintendo has done twice before, first with the GBC and then with the 3DS. Its also why I believe it will happen after 4yrs of the switch being out cause that coincides with 7nm fabrication maturity. Nintendo will most likely release a NS+ or something like that and kill off the original NS. And for like a year or so we will see cross platform games for the NS and NS+ and eventually more and more games will only be available on the NS+. Its kinda a way of padding the platform and ensuring continuity. As I have said they have done this before. And at that point the argument will be if we should call it a new console or not even though it has its own exclusives. |
I get what you are saying with GBC, it had a ton of exclusives but Nintendo still considered it the same platform as GB.
But when did they do that with the 3DS? You mean New 3DS? That had like 4 or 5 exclusives in its ~4 years on the market. Hardly enough to consider it a new platform.
If they release a Switch+ in 2021 it will likely be something along the lines of New 3DS or PS4 Pro, a mid-gen upgrade that has a handful of exclusives at the absolute most.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.
DélioPT said: Mario Odyssey didn't even crack top 20, but Just Dance 19, did? That's really surprising to see... |
Never underestimate the power of Just Dance. Every time I think the franchise is dead, it keeps on selling
NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick
zorg1000 said:
3. Well I cant really call people out on things I dont see. 4. I'll say it again, intrisic claimed 50m was his original prediction, the other user pointed out that it was actually 35-40m. That is not mocking someone, that is called correcting an error. There is nothing wrong with intrisic forgetting, we all forget things, but at the same time there is nothing wrong with refreshing someone's memory. 5. Ya I saw that prediction and it's so dumb that it's not even worth arguing over. One other reason why I question intrinsic and not some other posters is because intrinsic is an overall good poster that I enjoy debating with so I will try picking his brain when he says things I dont agree with. I enjoy a good debate and he is a good opponent (same goes for you). |
3 -fair enough
4 - Have just posted the link and said "Intrinsic your original prediction was 35-40m"? Nope, he felt the need to make more remarks on it. And as I said, he later requested me to have more humor, if he wasn't mocking he would say something along the lines of "I wasn't mocking him, I was just correcting his memory" not that it was really relevant since the user himself had admitted to lowball.
5 - Fair enough, no need to try and reason with someone just making outlandish remarks without reason. So he may have a point that will change your opinion. Like our porcupine. Even if you disagree with him you may be sure that his analysis and opinion is heavely data driven.
animegaming said:
“Fallout 76 physical sales achieved the third highest launch month sales in franchise history, trailing only Fallout 4 and Fallout New Vegas.” Laughs in Obsidian |
For a game with so many cheering against. That seems like they will be disappointed with it doing fine.
zorg1000 said:
Rounded PS4-1.47m NSW-1.36m XBO-1.34m |
Basically a triple statistical tie.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
zorg1000 said: I get what you are saying with GBC, it had a ton of exclusives but Nintendo still considered it the same platform as GB. But when did they do that with the 3DS? You mean New 3DS? That had like 4 or 5 exclusives in its ~4 years on the market. Hardly enough to consider it a new platform. If they release a Switch+ in 2021 it will likely be something along the lines of New 3DS or PS4 Pro, a mid-gen upgrade that has a handful of exclusives at the absolute most. |
I can't speak emphatically on the 3DS or new 3DS. But I a very sure abut the GBC though.
And yes nintendo still considered it the same platform.... but because something shares the same name doesn't make it the same platform the second it starts having its own exclusives.
It remains to be seen how nintendo will play it. But I don't see them supporting a cheaper NS and a more expensive NS+. Especially when we are likely to see a $199 NS about a year before we see a $299 NS+. I also expect them to make that version support the use of 4g data and whatnot. Its what I would do and how I would play it if I were them.
They could easily sell another 30M of the NS+ at $299 then drop the price later too..... all the while keeping the "Switch" moniker going loner than a typical 6yr cycle. Especially when you consider that considering its form factor there will be very little to differentiate it from a more powerful successor.
Intrinsic said:
I can't speak emphatically on the 3DS or new 3DS. But I a very sure abut the GBC though. And yes nintendo still considered it the same platform.... but because something shares the same name doesn't make it the same platform the second it starts having its own exclusives. It remains to be seen how nintendo will play it. But I don't see them supporting a cheaper NS and a more expensive NS+. Especially when we are likely to see a $199 NS about a year before we see a $299 NS+. I also expect them to make that version support the use of 4g data and whatnot. Its what I would do and how I would play it if I were them. They could easily sell another 30M of the NS+ at $299 then drop the price later too..... all the while keeping the "Switch" moniker going loner than a typical 6yr cycle. Especially when you consider that considering its form factor there will be very little to differentiate it from a more powerful successor. |
I agree about GBC, it honestly should have been a different generation due to the huge amount of exclusives it had but New 3DS was just a few so I would argue strongly against it being a separate generation.
I dont see why they wouldnt support both a $199 Switch Mini & $299 Switch Plus at the same time.
They supported a $129 2DS & $199 New 3DS XL at the same time.
Sony is supporting a $299 PS4 Slim & $399 PS4 Pro at the same time.
Microsoft is supporting a $299 Xbox One S & $499 Xbox One X at the same time.
When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.