I didn't know about the Harvard thing. First things first, this isn't point scoring for me like how your republicans and democrats do it. This is genuinely me thinking of my own country and what sort of person I want in the supreme court. I would want an above average person. That means above average in logic, in reason, in emotion and all other calibres. I would also want an impartial person who does well to keep his biases to his personal life. So when you say anyone would react like that, i'm saying I don't want anyone on any supreme court, I want the best most competent ones. That's what I am saying. If anyone will behave like that, why not just get a run of the mill judge. And he was there in his capacity to show what kind of justice he will be on the supreme court, like it or not. And he knew he would win. I'm not saying this is a republican thing, but in general parties in any country always stick to their man, more so in US these days, so he 99% knew he was a supreme court justice. Only the formalities remained. If you pretend you didn't know that, then I'm sorry but you have a bias whether you know it or not. So all in all what I saw of Brett cavanaugh, I wouldn't vote for him is all I say without any sort of affiliation bias

I have no love lost from either party. You can search through my posts about what I think of the US. I've been banned for that stuff. So I can say I'm unbiased and mean it. And if truly believe he was in danger of not being confirmed, you don't know how the parties in your country function. The 2 parties are not interested in what will be best for the country, they are interested in whether they keep making money or not. That's why you have gerrymandering from both sides, why healthcare and education are issues that never get resolved and why they lie about different things like immigrants, or the influence the wealthy have on both of them. Why Clinton screwed Bernie over and why people like Ted Cruz gave up any sense of decency to bow down to the new emperor of the republican party

If you want to go there, I'm equally biased against Dems and republicans so I'm overall neutral in that stance. My bias is different from your party bickering, my bias is against your war loving government. The biases are completely different. I don't hate your people and the supreme court is mostly for your people. So again I say, I wouldn't want the guy to be my supreme court justice. And looking from the outside, I can say no one doubted that he'd be confirmed

That's not what Biden said.  He said in June of 1992 that if a SC position needed to be filled that it should wait until after the election so that it doesn't interfere with the RNC, DNC, etc...

"In my view, politics has played far too large a role in the Reagan-Bush nominations to date. One can only imagine that role becoming overarching if a choice were made this year, assuming a justice announced tomorrow that he or she was stepping down.

"Should a justice resign this summer and the president move to name a successor, actions that will occur just days before the Democratic Presidential Convention and weeks before the Republican Convention meets, a process that is already in doubt in the minds of many will become distrusted by all. Senate consideration of a nominee under these circumstances is not fair to the president, to the nominee, or to the Senate itself.

"Mr. President, where the nation should be treated to a consideration of constitutional philosophy, all it will get in such circumstances is a partisan bickering and political posturing from both parties and from both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue. As a result, it is my view that if a Supreme Court Justice resigns tomorrow, or within the next several weeks, or resigns at the end of the summer, President Bush should consider following the practice of a majority of his predecessors and not — and not — name a nominee until after the November election is completed."

Mitch McConnell just twisted the hell out of what he said to make it look like Biden said no to a nominee in an election year.  In other words, Biden was fine with Bush getting to nominate his choice, he just didn't want that process creating further problems before the elections took place. 

That's France an incorrect assessment. Bias is not bias. You might be biased on whether you like pizza or burgers better but that does not mean you're biased on the elections in Italy. I reject that simplistic world view of "I hate the US military and I have a bias against them" is equal to " I am biased about a supreme court justice pick in US". That makes absolutely zero sense and is a very false equivalence. You have the correct observation but a very wrong conclusion. My bias against the US military is just that, you can't extrapolate it to mean anything else. And I was exxagerating when I talked about everyone but I was talking about outside the US. So of course republicans are mostly going to say his nomination was in jeopardy. Anyone who has no bias in favour of one party compared to the other is the people I am referring to. And as I said I have no bias towards the people of the US or more accurately an equal amount of bias for all of them if you think that you have to have a bias for everyone and everything. Hence I again insinuate the point that I wouldn't want Brett to be my supreme court justice as I feel he won't be a very good one

I feel like I'm just repeating myself here and so are you. I have given you my reasoning for why I think he'll be bad. My belief is judge people personally at their best and professionally at their worst. And I am affirming my bias for the military, so that has nothing to do with any bias against Brett so I say, my bias for  the military has nothing to do with Brett being a bad pick in my opinion. I have been as clear as I can be. And I understand that you disagree. I've shown you my perspective as have you so this is meaningless at this point. Have a good day and history will tell which of us was right. Of course if he does things you agree with, you'll be happy because it benefits you. What he does won't affect me that much so all I can do is access whether he's good or bad objectively. Let's just hope he doesn't do anything extremely bad

The Republicans rushed through and half-assed an investigation into a serious matter. Dr Ford may have not been able to prove Kavanaugh attacked her, but neither has Kavanaugh proven that he didn't.