fleischr said:
"National Socialist" translates to Nationalsozialistischen So "Nazi" for short.
The Nazis weren't capitalist. They seized private property, mandated extensive state control in the economy, and loathed trade with nations that didn't share goals of the Nazi ethnostate.
Socialists seize private property, mandate extensive control in the economy, and loathe the existence of capitalist market societies.
I don't think all socialists are Nazis - but there's an undeniable similarities between the two that make it clear that Nazis were/are socialists.
|
Names means nothing, only polarizing intentions. Socialist National is a term with a purpose: to create membership of the left and people of the center's workers to grow the strength of the party. Just the purpose, nothing more. And yet, the Nazis cultivated private enterprises and privatized masses (1930), expanded military force, spread injustice, false news and Nazi propaganda, the Aryan slogan of superiority, and so on. Nothing like socialism, actually different from most socialism applied in society. There is no nationalization of production assets, no attempts to equalize social life between people and reduce inequalities, the internationalism that socialism was known. There is similarity in the totalitarian question, above all. Until then, the military dictatorship in Chile and Argentina are similar and are notably of the extreme right while the socialism implanted until then is notably left.
Watch the video posted in firts page, it's a great explanation.