By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Metacritic adds "Must-Play Game" badge to 90+ games

 

Is this a good development?

Yes, this is a positive thing for consumers. 11 35.48%
 
No, this will negatively impact developers. 15 48.39%
 
Maybe. 5 16.13%
 
Total:31

Forgot to add:

This idea sucks bigly. It's misleading and will cause even more fighting.



"The rumours of my death have been greatly exaggerated."

- Single-player Game

Around the Network

IMO game scores come in 5 categories. And this only applies if you use Opencritic, and set it to only use reviewers you trust.

0-74 Don't bother. Games at this level are not worth your time or money.
75-79 A game that is worth taking a risk on, or picking up in the bargain bin, if you are a huge fan of the genre, or series.
80-84 Pick this up if you like the genre.
85-94 A must play, unless you don't like the genre.
95+ Play this. You hate the genre? Try it anyway. It may change your mind.



WhatATimeToBeAlive said:



It's worth noting that all those games, except Bayonetta 2, are available on PS4 (Hollow Knight's PS4 version release date is 25.9.2018). Inside's PS4 version should also be on the list since its score is 91 based on 18 reviews.

I wonder why almost all of those games are rated higher on XBOX ONE and SWITCH compared to PS4 (Divinity: Original Sin 2 on XBOX is rated 95, but it has only 8 reviews)? Could it be related to higher standars?

It is probably some big conspiracy. Or! It is reviewed by different people. Logical isn't it?



LGBTDBZBBQ said:

Zelda Series = 5 games = OOT 98(64)

Dude. Ninety..nine. As a Zelda fan I take great pride in that.

And now it’s even got a cool Must Play stamp!



OTBWY said:
WhatATimeToBeAlive said:

It's worth noting that all those games, except Bayonetta 2, are available on PS4 (Hollow Knight's PS4 version release date is 25.9.2018). Inside's PS4 version should also be on the list since its score is 91 based on 18 reviews.

I wonder why almost all of those games are rated higher on XBOX ONE and SWITCH compared to PS4 (Divinity: Original Sin 2 on XBOX is rated 95, but it has only 8 reviews)? Could it be related to higher standars?

It is probably some big conspiracy. Or! It is reviewed by different people. Logical isn't it?

I don't think it's a conspiracy. But there could be some media bias going on. You never know.



"The rumours of my death have been greatly exaggerated."

- Single-player Game

Around the Network

There's no such thing as a must-play. If a Fifa or NBA game got 100% Metascore, I wouldn't buy that game because I'm just not interested. If a JRPG got 70% I'd be concerned but it might still be a game more to my taste than a survival horror that gets 90%. Example: The Last Of Us is a great game but I've started it twice and can't get through it for the frustration ... if any game was going to be a “must-play” it's that but no way I “have to” play that game.

Play the games you want, not the ones someone tells you that you must play.



Surprised this has gotten so much traction. It’s a little badge next to high-scoring games. What is the controversy?



Veknoid_Outcast said:
Surprised this has gotten so much traction. It’s a little badge next to high-scoring games. What is the controversy?

I'd say it's about publishers putting even more pressure on developers (remember Obsidian and Fallout New Vegas with 84 Meta and no bonuses, since it didn't hit 85?), reinforcing general perception of your average mainstream gamer that anything beneath 90 is not that good of a game and of course, even more than it is now, shall we say...intensives...from publishers to major publications for stellar scores.



Veknoid_Outcast said:
Surprised this has gotten so much traction. It’s a little badge next to high-scoring games. What is the controversy?

Opencritic has four different badges, and nobody complained. But then again, there is a difference between saying a game is "Mighty", and saying a game is a "Must Play".



HoloDust said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:
Surprised this has gotten so much traction. It’s a little badge next to high-scoring games. What is the controversy?

I'd say it's about publishers putting even more pressure on developers (remember Obsidian and Fallout New Vegas with 84 Meta and no bonuses, since it didn't hit 85?), reinforcing general perception of your average mainstream gamer that anything beneath 90 is not that good of a game and of course, even more than it is now, shall we say...intensives...from publishers to major publications for stellar scores.

I get what you’re saying, but I’m not sure the addition of an icon will aggravate a Metacritic culture that’s already very well established. I think it’s up to consumers to do their homework and not treat Metacritic as gospel. WE give this badge its power, after all.