PwerlvlAmy said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
...How does that not change what you said?
The console isn't being ported over, the games are.
And if most of the ports are of titles that sold more than PS3, or hell even PS2 and PS1 exclusives, then why would it be ok to port them but not PS3 games?
|
Read over my previous posts in this thread where I already covered this sir.
|
I did. Literally all of them. And the ones about ports were hypocritical. Plain and simple. Your response of "hey man I stand by what I said and you should stand by what you said let's go smoke a blunt together" isn't a valid argument or even a good way to close a conversation.
There's nothing wrong with realizing your own past hypocricies but when you write shit like this:
"I stand by that Wii U ports to Switch make more sense due to the fact that no one even owned a Wii U and majority of its library was left to die. My comments in regards to Sony's ports were because they used the PR speak of ''People owned a 360 and didnt play these on PS3'', which was a lie considering 80m+ had a PS3. Excuses didnt hold water compared to the Wii U port talk that went on. "
while unironically forgetting that many of the games that are being ported sold as much as PS3 exclusives ...
Even if you want to say the games that sold worse deserve to be ported, which I think is a fine stance, where were you calling out Mario Kart 8 Deluxe? Or New Super Mario Brothers U Deluxe. Etc