By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales Discussion - Opinion: Nintendo need a SWITCH+ MODEL ASAP!

 

Does switch need a plus version?

Yes 17 26.56%
 
No 40 62.50%
 
Keep it the way it is 7 10.94%
 
Total:64
leo-j said:

The nintendo switch launched last year at a beautiful price of $299. The system exploded with success with what is argued to be the best ZELDA game in years...

 

No argument... best Zelda ever.

 



Feel free to check out my stream on twitch 

Around the Network

Its selling fine. They dont need to do anything at all atm except release good games.



They're not going to be able to keep up with high-end cellphones. And I'm not interested in buying a new switch every two years at $600+ a pop.



4 ≈ One

Console launched 1 year ago no need for a Plus so soon.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

zorg1000 said:
zygote said:

No. 

A smaller version with permanently attached joycon is needed for small children and more portability to help finish off the 3DS, but not until next year. Would be nice to see it launched alongside a Switch XL that replaces the bezel for screen area and is 1080 handheld, but even that model so early isn’t a must. The smaller child-friendly version needs to be released at the latest 2019 though. 

Ya i would like to see 3 revisions using the Tegra X2 over the next few years.

1. Switch Mini, portable only version, $199

2. Switch TV, console only version, $199

3. Switch Pro, more powerful hybrid version, $299

KBG9 is that you? you missed the SwitchPhone



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
DonFerrari said:
zorg1000 said:

Ya i would like to see 3 revisions using the Tegra X2 over the next few years.

1. Switch Mini, portable only version, $199

2. Switch TV, console only version, $199

3. Switch Pro, more powerful hybrid version, $299

KBG9 is that you? you missed the SwitchPhone

The things i proposed are not even close to the rediculous ideas he has, these are all logical revisions for them to make.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

zorg1000 said:
DonFerrari said:

KBG9 is that you? you missed the SwitchPhone

The things i proposed are not even close to the rediculous ideas he has, these are all logical revisions for them to make.

You know I'm joking and that this have been a proposition since the reveal of Switch that I consider valid, some customers would preffer to pay less (or more) having dedicated side so more battery for handheld only, more power for console only and perhaps most would just keep the hybrid.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:
zorg1000 said:

The things i proposed are not even close to the rediculous ideas he has, these are all logical revisions for them to make.

You know I'm joking and that this have been a proposition since the reveal of Switch that I consider valid, some customers would preffer to pay less (or more) having dedicated side so more battery for handheld only, more power for console only and perhaps most would just keep the hybrid.

Haha sorry, i didnt catch on that you were joking



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

zorg1000 said:
DonFerrari said:

You know I'm joking and that this have been a proposition since the reveal of Switch that I consider valid, some customers would preffer to pay less (or more) having dedicated side so more battery for handheld only, more power for console only and perhaps most would just keep the hybrid.

Haha sorry, i didnt catch on that you were joking

No problem, I understand that since I criticize Nintendo a lot you may have understood I was attacking them or you, no worries.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Does your Switch still look archaic when recalling you payed 700 more for your iPhone X? Or when you try to slam that Breath of the Wild cartridge into it? Yeah...