Where did you get your 'hands on' with this? Are Digital Foundry liars? It seems to hover around the 24-30 FPS mark, the vast majority of the time. It is clearly evident that the Switch should not even be able to run this game. That it does must certainly be impressive.
Impressive...haha. not even close. Its a slideshow even docked but handheld its closer to 15 fps than any game I've seen this gen. What I mean is its so noticeable it effect gameplay and MHW doesn't have a fucking chance...not even close. Docked or not.
I don't expect MHW on the Switch. When it was first announced, I did not expect current gen games period. I felt that at best it would be able to get some of the games from last-gen. If you are not impressed that a measly Tegra can do this, then nothing should be impressing you here on. I personally do not have a Switch, nor do I plan to buy one any time soon (I am happy with my PS4 Pro at the moment, and I do not game on the go), but if someone told me that a system running 3+ year old tablet tech will be able to run a game like this I would laugh at their face. Notice how the vast majority of current iPhone X games, which technically run on a platform far superior to the Switch, have comparably worse graphics on the whole. Same goes for any games running on the new Snapdragon 845 platform. Yes, these games are unoptimized for the most part, and that explains the disparity, but still -- this is a Tegra X1 running Wolfenstein II. Can we get realistic now?
Last edited by Helloplite - on 30 June 2018