By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Micorosft Studios E3 Expansion - 5 New 1st Party Studios (Ninja Theory, Playground Games, Undead Labs)

Another issue that Microsoft has with their 1st party is that they aren't really exclusives. Most, if not all of them, are also available on PC so it weakens the point of getting an Xbox when you could save up more money to get a gaming PC to get the best performance from these games.
When it comes to Sony and Nintendo, most, if not all of their main, important, first party games can only be played on their systems.
If I want to play Uncharted, InFamous, Horizon, Spider-Man, Gran Turismo, God of War, and Last of Us, I have to get a PS4. No ifs, ands, or buts.
If I want to play Mario, Pokemon, Zelda, Splatoon, Animal Crossing, Fire Emblem, and Smash Bros, I have to get a Switch. No ifs, ands, or buts.



Around the Network
jason1637 said:
Faelco said:

And? What is the relation here? What are you trying to say? 

Did Remedy announce a PS4 game? 

Remedy are working on a multiplat game. If MS don't buy studios that are already making exclusives its only a matter of time they decide to do something different.

Oh, OK, I didn't know that there was anything like that confirmed. So yeah, it's surely the best reason they had for buying studios. But it's not really an optimistic one...

"We have to buy them or they will leave us" isn't the best way to start a healthy collaboration IMO. 



Heavenly Sword 2 concept art has been out there for years, they planned on a second one and Sony didn`t greenlight it.



Pemalite said:
RoboTin said:

I think people have no issues Microsoft buying Playground games and undead laps who made only exclusive games to xbox one like naughty dog, Guerrilla Games and Suckerpunch did before they were acquired by sony. People probably have more issues the studios that were making multiplat games till today.

Just because Microsoft has purchased a Studio... Doesn't mean that the games being made stop being Multiplatform.
Case in point: Minecraft.

That's a little different. Sony already had a deal in place for the game to come to PS platforms before MS purchased them. Unless you're talking about Nintendo.



PSN ID- RayCrocheron82

XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82

NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237

YouTube- Rafie Crocheron

KazumaKiryu said:

In my opinion: Microsoft should rather develop (more) good own games, instead of buying multi-studios -.- 

That is just silly. You can't just suddenly start developing more games as that requires studios and staff, Building studios from scratch is expensive and time consuming, far more cost effective and faster to acquire decent ones that are already productive.



Around the Network
EspadaGrim said:
Oh how I love the Hypocrisy of some people saying that MS buying studios is bad and should just build them, Seems like people forget that Sony bought and did not build Naughty Dog, Guerrilla Games and Suckerpunch.

Preach! 



https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png%5B/IMG%5D">https://www.trueachievements.com/gamer/SliferCynDelta"><img src="https://www.trueachievements.com/gamercards/SliferCynDelta.png

EspadaGrim said:
Oh how I love the Hypocrisy of some people saying that MS buying studios is bad and should just build them, Seems like people forget that Sony bought and did not build Naughty Dog, Guerrilla Games and Suckerpunch.

Sony pretty much bought all their best studios. I just don't think buying studios is gona do much short term, and MS need short term badly. Long term it is definetly the right way to go.



EspadaGrim said:
Heavenly Sword 2 concept art has been out there for years, they planned on a second one and Sony didn`t greenlight it.

Not greenlighting is totally diferent than canceling as far as it goes.

nanarchy said:
KazumaKiryu said:

In my opinion: Microsoft should rather develop (more) good own games, instead of buying multi-studios -.- 

That is just silly. You can't just suddenly start developing more games as that requires studios and staff, Building studios from scratch is expensive and time consuming, far more cost effective and faster to acquire decent ones that are already productive.

Sorry but no. When you buy the studio you buy more than the bricks, you buy IPs, knowledge, so it costs more than creating a new one. Now if you want to talk bout being easier sure.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Microsft needs to jump on Blue hole, Hi rez, or psyonix. You need to keep building GAAS. I don't mind the aquisitions, but don't forget where the industry is going.



This really shows us Xbox fans that Microsoft has yet to give up on the brand!. 5 studios is a lot of to buy and announce at once. It seems they really do care for us! considering all these studios do develop single player titles. (With multiplayer as an option), Microsoft hasn't entirely gone GaaS.
And all it costs is $226 a year for the full experience (So high because of Canada's fucked economy that living vagina in office ruined).