By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Detroit: Become Human Reviews: 79 Metacritic, 80 OpenCritic

DonFerrari on 28 May 2018
Errorist76 said:
DonFerrari said:

My son? Do you mean GT5 because I love it?

 

Sorry, was a typo...autocorrect on my ipad. Was meant to say „yours“ is the perfect example for unprofessionalism in gaming journalism these days.

No problem =]

Azzanation said:
Errorist76;

Imho it makes a difference if the number strays by 20% from the middle, as in your GT example...or by 40%, as in Detroit‘s case.

Who makes that rule, You?

Reasonability? Statistics?

But why would we expect it from you when you have no issued with a 40 score based on "I don't like racers they are pointless"



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
Hynad on 28 May 2018
Azzanation said:
Errorist76;

Imho it makes a difference if the number strays by 20% from the middle, as in your GT example...or by 40%, as in Detroit‘s case.

Who makes that rule, You?

Aren't you the one telling others that the scores that are much lower than the overall consensus should be treated the same as the highest ones, regardless of the ratio between them?

95/100 = 15% higher than the average.

40/100 = 40% lower than the average.

But according to you, we should treat both the same way. Because reason.

Last edited by Hynad - on 28 May 2018

DonFerrari on 28 May 2018

I miss the times when games were scored with objective criterea as presentation, graphics, story (when applicable), gameplay, sound, enjoyment and lasting appeal.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Azzanation on 28 May 2018
Hynad said:
Azzanation said:

Who makes that rule, You?

Aren't you the one telling others that the scores that are much lower than the overall consensus should be treated the same as the highest ones, regardless of the ratio between them?

95/100 = 15% higher than the average.

40/100 = 40% lower than the average.

But according to you, we should treat both the same way. Because reason.

What makes you say a game scored higher by 15% isnt a troll post? How do you make judgement? A troll review is still a fake review.

And where did you do your maths? 100/100 on a game that averages 75 is a 25% difference. But i guess to you guys, unless its a direct 40% in the negative its considered a troll review and lets forgive the 10/10 scores of other games with average metas because reasons.



DonFerrari on 28 May 2018
Azzanation said:
Hynad said:

Aren't you the one telling others that the scores that are much lower than the overall consensus should be treated the same as the highest ones, regardless of the ratio between them?

95/100 = 15% higher than the average.

40/100 = 40% lower than the average.

But according to you, we should treat both the same way. Because reason.

What makes you say a game scored higher by 15% isnt a troll post? How do you make judgement? A troll review is still a fake review.

And where did you do your maths? 100/100 on a game that averages 75 is a 25% difference. But i guess to you guys, unless its a direct 40% in the negative its considered a troll review and lets forgive the 10/10 scores of other games with average metas because reasons.

Please sources and links for troll positive reviews.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
Mcube on 28 May 2018
DonFerrari said:
I miss the times when games were scored with objective criterea as presentation, graphics, story (when applicable), gameplay, sound, enjoyment and lasting appeal.

Detroit would probably have scored a lot lower if that system was still in place. 



Mcube on 28 May 2018
DonFerrari said:
Azzanation said:

What makes you say a game scored higher by 15% isnt a troll post? How do you make judgement? A troll review is still a fake review.

And where did you do your maths? 100/100 on a game that averages 75 is a 25% difference. But i guess to you guys, unless its a direct 40% in the negative its considered a troll review and lets forgive the 10/10 scores of other games with average metas because reasons.

Please sources and links for troll positive reviews.

I mean are we seriously talking about troll reviews? Every game gets them why are we all throwing a fit over someone taking the piss just find a reviewer you like and look at their judgement. 



Mcube on 28 May 2018
CGI-Quality said:
Mcube said:

Detroit would probably have scored a lot lower if that system was still in place. 

That's exactly how most reviewers have scored Detroit, actually. 

How so? It wouldnt make alot of sense since Detroid is a different kind of experience. It would kill in Graphics and sound but Gameplay and lasting appeal would surely suffer and since story is up to the reviewer it seems kinda unfair to judge a game with that system. 



Mcube on 28 May 2018
CGI-Quality said:
Mcube said:

How so? It wouldnt make alot of sense since Detroid is a different kind of experience. It would kill in Graphics and sound but Gameplay and lasting appeal would surely suffer and since story is up to the reviewer it seems kinda unfair to judge a game with that system. 

Have you read the reviews? It has been judged on all of those things, standing out for presentation, replay value (Detroit can be played a number of times in many different ways), and sound in most cases. 

I havent since I cant be hyped for David Cage games since the mess that was Beyond two souls. Ofcourse it gets judged on all these things but they dont do what they used to do with giving a score to each criteria and then making making it one score cause if they did that the game would most likely have a higher score. 



Hynad on 28 May 2018
Azzanation said:
Hynad said:

Aren't you the one telling others that the scores that are much lower than the overall consensus should be treated the same as the highest ones, regardless of the ratio between them?

95/100 = 15% higher than the average.

40/100 = 40% lower than the average.

But according to you, we should treat both the same way. Because reason.

What makes you say a game scored higher by 15% isnt a troll post? How do you make judgement? A troll review is still a fake review.

And where did you do your maths? 100/100 on a game that averages 75 is a 25% difference. But i guess to you guys, unless its a direct 40% in the negative its considered a troll review and lets forgive the 10/10 scores of other games with average metas because reasons.

And where did you do your maths? I took my numbers by going off the review aggregate pages. And the game didn't get a single 100. The highest score it got is 95, and the lowest is 40.

Where did you take your 100? The game stands at 79% on metacritics, and at 80% on opencritics. So where is that 75% coming from?

And funny how you don't go to the length you're going here when it comes to the games on your systems of choice. I expect you to act the same you do here from here on out. Regardless of what system the game is on. Bonus if it's a game you really enjoy.


Also, as Don asked, please point us to the positive troll reviews you speak of.

Last edited by Hynad - on 28 May 2018