By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 28 May 2018
Edit Thread
Azzanation said:
Hynad said:

Aren't you the one telling others that the scores that are much lower than the overall consensus should be treated the same as the highest ones, regardless of the ratio between them?

95/100 = 15% higher than the average.

40/100 = 40% lower than the average.

But according to you, we should treat both the same way. Because reason.

What makes you say a game scored higher by 15% isnt a troll post? How do you make judgement? A troll review is still a fake review.

And where did you do your maths? 100/100 on a game that averages 75 is a 25% difference. But i guess to you guys, unless its a direct 40% in the negative its considered a troll review and lets forgive the 10/10 scores of other games with average metas because reasons.

Please sources and links for troll positive reviews.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."