By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Hynad on 28 May 2018
Edit Thread
Azzanation said:
Hynad said:

Aren't you the one telling others that the scores that are much lower than the overall consensus should be treated the same as the highest ones, regardless of the ratio between them?

95/100 = 15% higher than the average.

40/100 = 40% lower than the average.

But according to you, we should treat both the same way. Because reason.

What makes you say a game scored higher by 15% isnt a troll post? How do you make judgement? A troll review is still a fake review.

And where did you do your maths? 100/100 on a game that averages 75 is a 25% difference. But i guess to you guys, unless its a direct 40% in the negative its considered a troll review and lets forgive the 10/10 scores of other games with average metas because reasons.

And where did you do your maths? I took my numbers by going off the review aggregate pages. And the game didn't get a single 100. The highest score it got is 95, and the lowest is 40.

Where did you take your 100? The game stands at 79% on metacritics, and at 80% on opencritics. So where is that 75% coming from?

And funny how you don't go to the length you're going here when it comes to the games on your systems of choice. I expect you to act the same you do here from here on out. Regardless of what system the game is on. Bonus if it's a game you really enjoy.


Also, as Don asked, please point us to the positive troll reviews you speak of.

Last edited by Hynad - on 28 May 2018