KBG29 said:
A lower price for PS3 would have made a huge difference, but then again, you would have to strip a bunch of value out. Get rid of B/C and the BR-Drive and it could have been $399.99, but the PS3 needed the BR-Drive to deliver the AAA exclusives, and at the time B/C was a standard on PlayStations. Had they not had B/C the outrage would have been just as big. Had they not had the BR-Drive, we would not have got the AAA exclusives that made SCEWWS a powerhouse of a publisher. I think we will get to a point where people will understand that consoles come in a range of options to fit your needs, but I don't quite think the market is ready for it yet, at least at launch. I also don't think Sony has any interest in loosing money on hardware again. If they want to transistion the way their ecoystsem is viewed, and offer a range of devices, then I think having a base, a Pro, and maybe even another tier throughout the gen would help continue to condition consumers for this business model. It would also allow them to always sell each tier at break even or profit. As for your expereince with your family, that is exactly what I had with Friends, Family, and Co-Workers. Like I said, they ask for a device with a list of features, I tell them PS3 has all of that, then they go out and buy a 360. Then they come back asking how to get their wifi to work, or hey I bought a Blu-ray like you were talking about, but the 360 won't play it. Then I explain that they need a Wifi adaptor, or a Blu-ray player, because 360 doesn't come with built in Wifi, and it has a DVD drive. Then they ask what is a good Blu-ray player, and I would say PS3, then they go, "well we don't need another console in the house", so they go out and buy a BR-Player that cost more than the PS3. Then 3D and Internet connected BR movies come out, and "hey how do you connect your BR for the online features, or how do you get 3D BR's to play in your BR player"? It just goes on and on like that. I also had some people grab the HD-DVD player, but it got even crazyer. Back in the day I actually hung out at the store during the whole BR/HD DVD thing, and tried to help people out. Even after HD DVD had thrown in the towel, and I had proof, people would still tell me no, HD-DVD is the new format for HD TV's. At that point I gave up. Now days I leave my tech debates to the boards. If someone asks me, I just say I don't know, you should research on Google, Bing, Yahoo, etc., and find the device that has what you want. I might chime in from time to time, when something is just way off from what they are looking for, but I have just tried to help to many times, and turned into the bad guy because they buy exactly the opposie of what I suggest, and end up hating. Better off to make no suggestion, or play dumb, then they might accidently stumble into the right thing, or at least your neutral when they come complaining. |
Well depending on how much it cost to add in the PS2 hardware, plus any extra engineering the PS3 needed to do that, and the larger footprint and packaging etc, but yes, it's very hard to see them going without the BD drive and sticking with multiple DVD's like the 360 did. I would imagine if more cost was needed to bring the price down to $399, that it would be done through lesser performing hardware. Considering the leap PS3 was over PS2, a little less performance wouldn't have been a deal breaker. No BC would have caused a stir initially, but if they were able to clearly communicate to casuals that adding a PS2 required this much more cost to the product, that would probably have been enough to justify the lower price, similar to PS4.
Most people interested like to ask questions, but just want an easy answer right here and right now, not a "lecture". Sure, it got them what they wanted quicker, but it often ends up costing them more and taking longer overall because they didn't take the lesser extra time earlier to get the whole scoop. The world has become such a roller coaster, and one that your taught to remain on at all times, that very few actually get off and take breaks. Those that do, end up realizing that it's actually good for you and really helps in the long run. Filling your time with 95% doing and 5% thinking, is part of the reason why so many wealthy people remain wealthy. They have the time to do much more thinking than normal and it gives them a major advantage. If you want to save time for later, you have to invest time now. The benefit is that you will have "wasted" less time thinking overall if you do most of your thinking beforehand, as much as possible anyway. You will always run into bumps along the road, but there's a big difference between instantly jumping into the rear wheel drive car because it's got a full tank to drive through a snowstorm, vs a short stop to fill up to take the 4x4 pick up.