From these games I played Sea of Thieves and Far Cry 5, and I'm playing God of War, in my opinion 6 for Far Cry 5 is fair, 7 for Sea of Thieves It's a little more than the game deserves, and 8 for God of War it's less than the game deserves. Well, that's nothing more than my opinion.

Scores:

God of War - 8

Sea of Thieves - 7

Far Cry 5 - 6

A Way Out - 6

Extinction - 3

Scribblenauts Showdown - 3

Minit - 6

Detective Pikachu - 6 

Source

Wow. GoW is just a single point above Sea of Thieves. And then Far Cry 5 is somehow worse than SoT? Yeah, this is why I don't bother with Edge. Seriously though, a generation defining game is only a little bit better than a half finished AA title?

Far Cry 5 a 6?
Edge does this for the lolz at this point

Hmmm the last 10 PlayStation exclusive (or console-exclusive) games reviewed by Edge...

God of War :                       Meta - 95          Edge - 80
Ni no Kuni 2 :                      Meta - 81          Edge - 70
Yakuza 6 :                             Meta - 83         Edge - 80
Gran Turismo Sport :         Meta - 75          Edge - 60
Knack 2 :                              Meta - 69          Edge - 50
Yakuza Kiwami :                  Meta - 80         Edge - 80
Uncharted Lost Legacy :    Meta - 84         Edge - 80
Hellblade :                           Meta - 81         Edge - 40
Persona 5 :                          Meta - 93         Edge - 80
Nier Automata :                 Meta - 88         Edge - 80

Every single one lower, except one that was equal. Average of 12.9 points lower.

Yeah I'm beginning to see a pattern here. xD

Edit: Oh I missed Dissidia. Which surprise surprise they rated 5/10 compared to the metascore of 67.

Classic.

Ni No Kuni 2 is 85 on Metacritic for PS4. 

Nah they only use integers, reviewers that use decimal points are clearly more accurate.

I'd agree with Edge. Sometimes you find a very impressive game gets stellar reviews but when you start playing it after a short while the shine wears off a bit. Edge seems to adjust for that but many review sites just go with the initial hype for the game.  Other games sometimes have the opposite effect where the hype has overblown the game and it hasn't met people's expectations due to all the hype and reviewers punish the game for that reason but the actual game can still be pretty good with lots of things to enjoy just not the awesome title people expected and again I think Edge often adjust for that too. 

That's my take on it but whatever I tend to find I agree with Edge reviews when I play the game.

Pretty much what I expected from EDGE.

So does Quarter to Three.  So what?  Doesn't mean they're more credible at all.