Forums - Politics Discussion - US, UK and France launch attack on Syria, including its capital Damascus

Such a shame. Idiot Trump, what an emotion-driven dumbass.

An enormous scandal that a fake chemical attack is being used against the Assad regime, backed by the corrupt Western media agitating for an illegitimate attack on Syria.



Around the Network

Russia reacts after US, UK and France strike Syria

https://youtu.be/LFEUX014xHE



I want to see how strong S400 from Russia is



So a leader of the country, Assad used chemical weapons (supposedly) and now the response is to bomb a city...

How do these people become our leaders?



Is April the bombing month now?



Around the Network

What I'm really curious about is why Asad decided to use chemical weapons now. Pretty much the only major red line most countries established is the use of said weaponry, and he just went and used it now that he was actually winning the war against the ISIS. What's the motivation?



You know it deserves the GOTY.

Come join The 2018 Obscure Game Monthly Review Thread.

John2290 said:
Kerotan said:

No they won't. 

When the US launches a strike on a Russian ally with nothing more than media here say, they already are. They're waging a fucking proxy battle for months now. Surely the US has no interest in Assad having control in Syria. This is escalating way to quickly and aggressively, whether it is labeled open war or not is redundant, it's still a fucking war and it is going to mean more attacks for us in Europe and a greater war in the middle east. War is war, no matter where it's fought and this is dangerously close to having Global consequences, if the US were dupped here or there is other agendas at play this is ball shriving stuff.

They've been doing that since the cold War. This is nothing knew. 



Darwinianevolution said:
What I'm really curious about is why Asad decided to use chemical weapons now. Pretty much the only major red line most countries established is the use of said weaponry, and he just went and used it now that he was actually winning the war against the ISIS. What's the motivation?

Had the same thought myself.



Darwinianevolution said:
What I'm really curious about is why Asad decided to use chemical weapons now. Pretty much the only major red line most countries established is the use of said weaponry, and he just went and used it now that he was actually winning the war against the ISIS. What's the motivation?

Whatever the reason the end result is to escalate confrontations between Russia and US/allies. The end goal for anti US rebles in this conflict is to kill as many americans as possible, they have mostly succeeded. We at the point now where we have petagon backed and funded rebels fighting against cia backed and funded rebels, its a nut house over there and Trump just played right into the trap. 



ironmanDX said:
So a leader of the country, Assad used chemical weapons (supposedly) and now the response is to bomb a city...

How do these people become our leaders?

Dont worry Trump will start a war down there over it.

And the real reason for the conflict:
Russia makes money from selling gas to europe.
America wants to keep russia weak, economically, so to go after russia, they ll run a pipe from Qatar -> iran -> syria -> turkey -> sell in europe.

Russia is like "we dont want this, you guys are clearly doing this to hurt our economy" so they support the faction thats against running pipes through syria.

America doesnt care if there "supposedly" was a gas attack, or who did it (we still dont know for sure).
Yet its quick to place blame, and star a war over this, all to get at russia.

 

Darwinianevolution said:
What I'm really curious about is why Asad decided to use chemical weapons now. Pretty much the only major red line most countries established is the use of said weaponry, and he just went and used it now that he was actually winning the war against the ISIS. What's the motivation?

Who cares about burden of proof.....  if they need to "make up" reason to justify attacking they will.
Remember the Saddam? they made a fake report (on behalf of the us) and used it to justify the invasion.
He clearly had weapons of mass destruction and was a threat to the entire world... . except he wasnt, and didnt have any weapons.

Last edited by JRPGfan - on 14 April 2018