Roar_Of_War said:
That suggests Mario was overshipped and is even slower than expected, tho. |
It just had to catch up, and even then, the Sell through of Mario Odyssey was 1.5 million higher than Botw anyways.
Roar_Of_War said:
That suggests Mario was overshipped and is even slower than expected, tho. |
It just had to catch up, and even then, the Sell through of Mario Odyssey was 1.5 million higher than Botw anyways.
PortisheadBiscuit said: They'll both lose to MK8:D |
True this
At this point in its life, Twilight Princess had sold over 5.62M (4.30M Wii, >1.32M GCN). Super Mario Galaxy had sold 6.10M.
The final sales of each game:
Twilight Princess: 8.85M
Super Mario Galaxy: 12.77M
BotW has exceeded TP by 77.6%, while Odyssey has exceeded Galaxy by 70.7%.
If we do some naive number-crunching:
Breath of the Wild LT: 15.72M
Super Mario Odyssey LT: 21.79M
MasonADC said:
It just had to catch up, and even then, the Sell through of Mario Odyssey was 1.5 million higher than Botw anyways. |
No it wasn’t. They were both 7.5 million with Wii U included. They were equal, and the gap in shipments has now decreased. Considering Zelda had a higher sell-through rate compared to shipped numbers than SMO, that potentially even suggests Zelda might have a current higher sell-through rate, if anything.
Last edited by Roar_Of_War - on 04 May 2018StarDoor said: At this point in its life, Twilight Princess had sold over 5.62M (4.30M Wii, >1.32M GCN). Super Mario Galaxy had sold 6.10M. The final sales of each game: Twilight Princess: 8.85M Super Mario Galaxy: 12.77M BotW has exceeded TP by 77.6%, while Odyssey has exceeded Galaxy by 70.7%. If we do some naive number-crunching: Breath of the Wild LT: 15.72M Super Mario Odyssey LT: 21.79M |
Huh.. I'd say those LT numbers are actually a realistic outcome.
There is a small argument to be made here that because Breath of the Wild is a very different Zelda game that appeals to a much larger audience that it has a chance to challenge Odyssey.
That said, Mario is Mario and Zelda is Zelda. Zelda is a game and Mario is a brand. He's the jam to Nintendo's peanut butter. You don't see Nintendo without seeing or thinking Mario(and more recently Pikachu). On top of that, Nintendo will market Mario games much more, as he is their home console killer app.
"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"
Roar_Of_War said:
No it wasn’t. They were both 7.5 million with Wii U included. They were equal, and the gap in shipments has now decreased. Considering Zelda had a higher sell-through rate compared to shipped numbers than SMO, that potentially even suggests Zelda might have a current higher sell-through rate, if anything. |
I'm clearly not counting the Wii U version,
mZuzek said:
So? |
?
"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"
MasonADC said:
I'm clearly not counting the Wii U version, |
Why wouldn’t you?