Donkey Kong sold less than a million, Pokemon around 1.5 and big brain over 3 million. Wii play is the only one out of those 4 that sold insanely well, which is partially due to it coming with a new controller. It's hard to compare sales of switch and Wii games at this point due to none of the switch games even being a year old yet. While every Wii game has had years of  sales

If we're going by sales than the switch is doing great. Zelda on switch will be the best selling in the series. Mario will be the best selling 3d Mario ever. Mario kart is a bigger seller than everything except Wii sports. Splatoon 2 has sold more than most of the games you listed.Metroid isn't a high seller. Most of the switch games listed are likely to outsell most of the Wii games listed. So not only does the switch have better critical reception but it will likely have better commercial reception.

I did dispute the impact from the very beginning that's the whole point of highlighting the numbers across gens to highlight it wasn't the result of the software's own impact but more so the platform's own impact and market approach.

One of the reasons BC isn't really credited is that the games are not new releases even though a port is a version of another game its still a new release for the new platform while BC isn't BC is a feature albeit a convenient one but just that a feature like having media capabilities, BC is essentially you just having your old console as a feature otherwise it would be like saying the upcoming VC for Switch and all its games count when it launches it's an argument that reaches because if GC is on the NS VC then all of a sudden under the same mode of logic it would be argued the GC library are now Switch games. When debating a platform's own library BC games aren't considered because they're the library of a prior platform via a feature.

A port however is a new release for a platform, MK8D was a new release with additions, Pokken was a new release with additions as both these games were a new version of another on the case of BOTW and TP under the market they aren't even ports they're multiplatform release which is a different scenario altogether.

Where did you dispute Wii Sport's impact? As a matter of fact, don't waste my time. If for some reason you do not think Wii Sports had a massive impact on the gaming industry, there is literally nothing further for us to discuss as you are stupid or delusional. Either way, there will be no reconciliation. As I said over and over, you never negated Wii Sports impact, you just tried to minimize it by moving the goalposts. Which is fine, but I am not stupid enough to fall for it.

I do not care why you do not count backwards compatibility. Ports of games being praised while a whole feature that basically makes ports to a console pointless gets ignored, is just... petty. If Switch was backwards compatible, would we be seeing all these Wii U ports? But then, maybe Switch would have more original titles, like Wii.

I've got 27 games for the switch since I got it in July. That's more than any other console I've ever owned in that period of time. The only console that comes close is the ps4, but I got that a couple of years after launch.

I questioned and disputed the perceived impact you used in your logic by looking at the performance of such software across varying platforms but as it goes you're too backward to grasp was put before you it's almost as if you're high when posting, when looking the performance of the software on varying platforms the said software only performed on the Wii a platform with numerous factors that surround it which may have been the actual driving force and impact instead of software like while in contrast the comparable software on the Switch performed even platforms with out the Wii's surrounding factors highlighting a more conrete case of them having actual impact. For a start not once did you have a response for WS being packed in with the Wii or that equivalent software on a non Wii platform perform erratically indicating impact maybe due to other factors all you did was side step arguments and refused to answer, the irony in the goalposts comments is that I didn't move any you did with the numbers logic to start.

Don't care then but that's how it is BC are not new releases funny thing is your banging on about ports yet right now the are only two out which shoots down this route you're trying to argue and even if we count future currently announced ports the number of original games coming to the platform still outnumbers the Wii U ports by a mile.

As for your insults deal with it mate.

So, you attempted to dispute the impact by moving the goalposts? Gotcha.

The rest of your post is rambling garbage that I needn't reply to. Glad you wasted your time writing that reply.

The Donkey Kong game was a spin off that did reach 1 million.

The Pokemon game was also a spin off that sold over 1 million.

Wii Play needs no discussion.

Zelda on Wii had to compete with Wii Sports which no game on Switch has to deal with a game of that magnitude but it was still the best selling Zelda up to that point.

Mario the same story. In their context, best selling game up to that point.

I am not saying the sales of these games is better than how Switch is doing, no no. Sales are the consequence of many factors outside the game. I was just saying that these games did sell well. Outselling Wii titles does not make them better games either. If that were the case, Okami would be one of the better selling games of all time... but candy crush murders it is sales. My point was that those games that did not review well did manage to sell well and I could use their sales as proof that scores mean nothing in the long run. I was not using it to discredit Switch's sales in any way.

The point of my comments is to raise awareness to something that nobody wants to admit. Wii sold well for all the right reasons. Wii gets shit for the, "casual" games it brought to the table but the fact that there is an argument (in my opinion Wii's first year is better) for Wii vs. Switch proves that Wii was successful for all the right reasons and that it is not a console that deserves the insane amount of shit it has gotten over the years. If you think Switch is better, more power to you. But I will take Mario, Metroid, Zelda, Pokemon, Fire Emblem, Wii Sports, and then all the third party stuff as well as games like Strikers over what Switch has offered me so far. It is close, but Wii gets the edge in my opinion. Regardless, the fact that there is a legitimate argument that can be made for Wii is the most crucial take away. I hope people come to their senses about Wii and why it was such a smashing success. It offered games for everyone.

Zelda on Wii had to compete with Wii Sports which no game on Switch has to deal with a game of that magnitude