It is not flawed. It is how we find out what is real and what is not. Yes, we don't know everything, but it is the method we used towards learning what is real and what isn't. We can't assume things we don't know are real, therefore we assume they aren't until we can prove they are.

Nintendo isn't an object or entity in physical terms. The example doesn't apply either, unless you mean a Nintendo console. That exists, it's provable. Nintendo company of workers is real, it's provable.

Ah, so Amber Heard has not been rejecting my love.  That's a load off my mind.

That is because your undecided is not a logical stance. It's the lack of one.

"We can't assume things we don't know are real, therefore we assume they aren't until we can prove they are."

This is how reality is determined. I regret that i cannot seem to make you see that.

There is a gap in between the first and second parts. Yes, we can't assume things we don't know are real, but how does that inevitably lead towards the second one?

I don't understand what can be missing. If we can't prove them to be real, they can't be proven to be real and therefore we can't assume they are. If we can't assume they are real, they are not real until proven otherwise. Theres no in-between state. 

Oh i did notice i was missing a "that" in the sentence.

"We can't assume that things we don't know are real, therefore we assume they aren't until we can prove they are."

Go me posting all this on the Wii U browser. xD

Here's the part where you shove your other foot in your mouth; I'm not religious. Not even slightly. But you know, keep making assumptions. Like the ones where you assume Atheism and Agnosticism are the same thing.

Do we need to bring the definitions back really quick? Maybe this whole thread is best enjoyed when we argue over the definition of that word.

You made it unnecessary complicated for yourself, arf. Instead of using the term "rejected" you could go with lack of belief, arf.

You can't reject something you don't know or a concept you are not aware of, arf. But you can not believing in one, arf. Since not believing until being aware of something is the default position, arf.

Meaning, you never believed in the almighty God Neko until I told you of his existence, arf. From this moment on you  can  decide to start believing in it ( becoming an theist) or reject the concept of his existence ( stay an atheist), arf. I say "stay" because until then, you were without a God, thus by definition and the very meaning of the word is an atheist, arf. Atheos, where a = without, theos = God, arf.

It is a theoligical position, not a claim on the existence of God, arf.

oh wow... Pascal's wager in disguise... I sure am impressed by it :)

it's an interesting quote.

I still think with its impact it's infinitely important. Think of all the people it's persecuted and the suffering its caused.