Nem said:
That is because your undecided is not a logical stance. It's the lack of one. "We can't assume things we don't know are real, therefore we assume they aren't until we can prove they are." This is how reality is determined. I regret that i cannot seem to make you see that. |
There is a gap in between the first and second parts. Yes, we can't assume things we don't know are real, but how does that inevitably lead towards the second one?