VGPolyglot said:
There is a gap in between the first and second parts. Yes, we can't assume things we don't know are real, but how does that inevitably lead towards the second one? |
I don't understand what can be missing. If we can't prove them to be real, they can't be proven to be real and therefore we can't assume they are. If we can't assume they are real, they are not real until proven otherwise. Theres no in-between state.
Oh i did notice i was missing a "that" in the sentence.
"We can't assume that things we don't know are real, therefore we assume they aren't until we can prove they are."
Go me posting all this on the Wii U browser. xD
Last edited by Nem - on 13 January 2018






