By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
VGPolyglot said:
Nem said:

That is because your undecided is not a logical stance. It's the lack of one.

"We can't assume things we don't know are real, therefore we assume they aren't until we can prove they are."

This is how reality is determined. I regret that i cannot seem to make you see that.

There is a gap in between the first and second parts. Yes, we can't assume things we don't know are real, but how does that inevitably lead towards the second one?

I don't understand what can be missing. If we can't prove them to be real, they can't be proven to be real and therefore we can't assume they are. If we can't assume they are real, they are not real until proven otherwise. Theres no in-between state. 

Oh i did notice i was missing a "that" in the sentence.

"We can't assume that things we don't know are real, therefore we assume they aren't until we can prove they are."

Go me posting all this on the Wii U browser. xD

Last edited by Nem - on 13 January 2018