By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - The Fans Have Spoken, Last Jedi Drops A Massive 68%

Lucas-Rio said:

Unccorected data is at 7.2 and still dropping.

I said uncorrected data and the uncorrected data is 7.2, deal deal deal with it.

I'm pretty sure some people here are damn salty that a Socialist has to explain how numbers work and what words mean, but here we are.  Once again.
Deal deal deal with it.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/uncorrected

Definition of uncorrected
not corrected not made right having flaws or errors 



Around the Network
Lucas-Rio said:
Goodnightmoon said:

Dude, that is a completely unreasonable score that do not represent what the other 95% of people think, can't you fucking see it? There is an aberration in that jump in the bottom, if the score wasn't weightened you would have a tiny minority dragging the score way too much. You are the one owned by a graphic that clearly showcases that there is a ton of haters, trolls and people with childlike tantrums giving a completely unrepresentative and unreasonable score that the rest does not share. If you do the average with the other 95% that doesn't give the movie a 1/10 you have the movie very close to an 8 which mean most people liked it a lot, get over it and learn to read graphics.

 

The only thing you have is a manipulated IMDB score that still slowing down...

All the others critics are brutal...

Rotten toamtoes, by far the worst star Wars

 

Metacritics 

 

 

It's getting damaged in germany

 

Destroyed in France

 

 

 

Kicked to the ground in Italy

 

 

 

It's a worldwide disappointment and backlash, the movie is being rejected by all the true SW fans.

IMDb had hundreds of thousands of reviews.  All those scores you just posted were less than 10k reviews combined, so sorry you haven’t proved anything.  

And if you remove the obvious troll reviews “1’s”, then the user score is quite comparable to the critic score.



Something...Something...Games...Something

JakDaSnack said:
Lucas-Rio said:

 

The only thing you have is a manipulated IMDB score that still slowing down...

All the others critics are brutal...

Rotten toamtoes, by far the worst star Wars

 

Metacritics 

 

 

It's getting damaged in germany

 

Destroyed in France

 

 

 

Kicked to the ground in Italy

 

 

 

It's a worldwide disappointment and backlash, the movie is being rejected by all the true SW fans.

IMDb had hundreds of thousands of reviews.  All those scores you just posted were less than 10k reviews combined, so sorry you haven’t proved anything.  

And if you remove the obvious troll reviews “1’s”, then the user score is quite comparable to the critic score.

 

RT has over 165 000 reviews, what are you talking about? It is also not manipulating the scores unlike IMDB.

Also, I score the movie 0.5/10, this is not a troll review, I hated the movie for excellent reasons. Why don't you call "troll reviews" people who are scoring this movie 10/10? Do you think it's a masterpiece that ranks beside movies like The Godfather or even scifi references like Blade Runner ? It's very far from it.



Lucas-Rio said:
JakDaSnack said:

IMDb had hundreds of thousands of reviews.  All those scores you just posted were less than 10k reviews combined, so sorry you haven’t proved anything.  

And if you remove the obvious troll reviews “1’s”, then the user score is quite comparable to the critic score.

 

RT has over 165 000 reviews, what are you talking about? It is also not manipulating the scores unlike IMDB.

Also, I score the movie 0.5/10, this is not a troll review, I hated the movie for excellent reasons. Why don't you call "troll reviews" people who are scoring this movie 10/10? Do you think it's a masterpiece that ranks beside movies like The Godfather or even scifi references like Blade Runner ? It's very far from it.

I’m talking about the ones you posted.  Yes RT has more reviews, but considering that you just need a fraction of the fan base to score a 0 or 1 to dramatically alter the average score, RT frankly can’t be trusted.  A 10/10 can be a troll review depending on the quality, let’s say a movie was bad and honestly deserved a 1/10(movies like The Room,or troll 2). And then someone gave it a 10/10, that would significantly skew the average and therefor is “trolling”.  The average score from critics for TLJ is in the 80’s, so a fan giving it a 10/10 doesn’t really do much, so it’s not trolling.  

However you giving it a 0.5/10 is claiming that the movie is on par with other bad films like troll 2, The Room etc.  This alone discredits your opinion of the film.  If you gave it say a 5 or 4, and gave legitimate reasons, then sure, I’d buy it.  But a 0.5, nope. Even the OP of this thread gave it a 7/10 and he’s been talking shit about it non stop.



Something...Something...Games...Something

JakDaSnack said:
Lucas-Rio said:

 

RT has over 165 000 reviews, what are you talking about? It is also not manipulating the scores unlike IMDB.

Also, I score the movie 0.5/10, this is not a troll review, I hated the movie for excellent reasons. Why don't you call "troll reviews" people who are scoring this movie 10/10? Do you think it's a masterpiece that ranks beside movies like The Godfather or even scifi references like Blade Runner ? It's very far from it.

I’m talking about the ones you posted.  Yes RT has more reviews, but considering that you just need a fraction of the fan base to score a 0 or 1 to dramatically alter the average score, RT frankly can’t be trusted.  A 10/10 can be a troll review depending on the quality, let’s say a movie was bad and honestly deserved a 1/10(movies like The Room,or troll 2). And then someone gave it a 10/10, that would significantly skew the average and therefor is “trolling”.  The average score from critics for TLJ is in the 80’s, so a fan giving it a 10/10 doesn’t really do much, so it’s not trolling.  

However you giving it a 0.5/10 is claiming that the movie is on par with other bad films like troll 2, The Room etc.  This alone discredits your opinion of the film.  If you gave it say a 5 or 4, and gave legitimate reasons, then sure, I’d buy it.  But a 0.5, nope. Even the OP of this thread gave it a 7/10 and he’s been talking shit about it non stop.

Why would I give a 5/10 to a movie that left me disgusted and angry leaving the theater? It's the first time i have felt this disgusted leaving a movie. It's a feeling worst than just watching a standard bad movie. Troll 2 may have worst special effects and acting, it is not going to destroy a beloved franchise.

It shows that the professionals critics have no clue once again, or that Disney has deep pockets. The fans knew better, as usual.



Around the Network

Anyone who gives this film a 0.5/10 does not have excellent reasons. The acting, cinematography, and direction alone warrant a 4/10.

User reviews are laughable and anyone who uses them to prove a point are just desperate to "Prove those bought out, biased critics wrong!" The box office and the people I actually talk to in real life paint a different picture of the public's perception towards the film and they're not protesting the interesting and nuanced characterization of Luke Skywalker.



JakDaSnack said:
It amazes me that this thread is still active and has over 800 responses.

Cool isnt it? Im just waiting for it to reach 1000.

The movie sucks by the way :-p



Simpleton said:
Anyone who gives this film a 0.5/10 does not have excellent reasons. The acting, cinematography, and direction alone warrant a 4/10.

User reviews are laughable and anyone who uses them to prove a point are just desperate to "Prove those bought out, biased critics wrong!" The box office and the people I actually talk to in real life paint a different picture of the public's perception towards the film and they're not protesting the interesting and nuanced characterization of Luke Skywalker.

Although I hated the movie youre right, it deserves at least a 4. 0 or 1 does not make sense. At the same time all people who gives it a 10 is ALSO distorting the avetage since it makes no sense giving this movie anything above 8.5. I think my rating would be around 4 or 5 due to very very poor writing and editing. 



Vincoletto said:
JakDaSnack said:
It amazes me that this thread is still active and has over 800 responses.

Cool isnt it? Im just waiting for it to reach 1000.

The movie sucks by the way :-p

I disagree, but I respect your opinion.



It is funny that we can consider the game not deserving a 0 or 1 make all scores below 4 unaceptable, but at the same time we must accept all 9 and 10... so why not make the average between 4 and 8 votes and then get the average?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."