Final-Fan said:
bdbdbd said:
It's sometimes confusing, as in the same sentence you first talk about Africa as a continent of origin, then America, as one country in Americas.
|
Here's my two cents on the topic: There is no continent called "America". You have "North America" and "South America". Some people like to throw Central America into the mix, though it's not a continent. Sorta like the Middle East, maybe—but I'm getting off topic.
Maybe it's not fair that the USA gets "American" all to itself, but that's how things shook out: we were early, we are big, it's part of our full name, and we've got dibs. Referring to what belongs to a continent can still be done unambiguously by "North American" or "South American": e.g. NAFTA, North American Free Trade Agreement. I don't recall, off the top of my head, that I've ever heard someone use "American" to refer to "belonging to both North and South America generally"; can you point to an example of this usage? I'm sort of interested in hearing an example...
|
No, there's no continent called america, just like there's no country called america. "America" is a little unspecific term, and it's meaning depends a lot of the context.
Most often you see "America" refer to USA and Canada. This is the typical political reference. On a larger scale, when you count in Mexico (and maybe Central America), it's usually referred North-America. South-America is referred as South-America. Americas you see referred "Americas", when you talk about both Americas, or sometimes "America", when it's either America in question, but not both.
Individual countries you see being referred by their names: Canada is Canada, USA is USA, Mexico is Mexico, Cuba is Cuba, Brazil is Brazil, and so on.