Still. You were close enough.
Although... Those are synthetics, not real-world so your mileage will still vary.

Well. Mostly because I don't care about pricing. Obviously.
I am a little biased in this aspect because I own a dozen consoles in conjunction with high-end PC's and thousands of games across them all, $100 is stuff all money in 2017 at the end of the day.

But... We also need to remember the Xbox One X is also marketed as a Premium product, it is meant to have a higher price.
The Xbox One S is the more budget orientated product and will push the lower price... That is generally why companies have multiple products in a product lineup, so they can hit various price points and the needs/wants/desires of as many consumers as possible to make a buck.

It's more than just a concept, it's in active development.

You don't have to download 4k assets on an Xbox One. That is a false assertion on your behalf.
You have the option to download 4k assets on the Xbox One so you can migrate them over to an Xbox One X at a later date.

SDXC/NVMe isn't going to offset memory bandwidth. Not in a mobile device.
Besides... NVMe solutions typically top out at 3GB/s... Which isn't going to make much of a difference at the end of the day when Ram is easily 10x that in the super low-end these days.
Also NVMe @ 3GB/s requires power, not something that is ideal in a mobile device.
Not to mention that NVMe drives obtain such transfer rates thanks to the use of a ton of memory chips, memory operations can be highly parallel.

SDXC is even more depressing. Most SDXC cards top out at around 100MB/s.
Some premium cards can do 280MB/s... But all pale in comparison to the 20,000-60,000MB/s that ram can potentially offer in a mobile device.

Not entirely sure I understand your reasoning.

Are you suggesting a device gains more "GF" the lower the resolution goes?

Apple seems to be ahead of the industry with it's mobile chips... And they really are not directly comparable to the competition...
Mostly because Apples ARM cores tend to be extremely wide along the lines of an Intel Core chip.

Would it be out-performing a Core i5 that can turbo to 3.5-3.6Ghz though? Hell no.
But it's still a potent chip all things considered.

No one codes directly to the hardware anymore, no one writes in Assembly/Machine in 2017, there is no need for it.
But the good thing about that is... It's far easier to retain backwards compatibility and develop software and games.

With that... A Pascal based Tegra can provide 50% more performance for the same power over the Maxwell Tegra (Aka. The chip in the Switch).
And provide 128% more bandwidth. (The biggest game changer for performance at 1080P verses the Switch.)

A Volta based Tegra has already been demonstrated for a few markets like cars... And is set to double the Pascal based Tegra again and is using 16nm at TSMC.
There would be power/performance gains if nVidia shifted Volta Tegra to "12nm" as well of a around 10%...

In short, I doubt we will get a chip that is a Playstation 4 in identical capabilities for many years yet, but we can get "close enough" with hardware available today/soon.

I believe the problem in this case would arise if they start releasing X1 version of games that are excessively bad because the port is focused on X1X. But since X1 isn't so far from PS4, I don't think that will happen this gen.

He is talking X1 or PS4 price versus X1X not PS4Pro... X1X selling for 499 is more than double X1/PS4 price right now... and if (some are expecting) PS4Pro drops to 299 then X1X will be "near" double the price of PS4Pro.

Not that anyone that think about buying X1X is worried about how much the other 3 cost, because if he was he wouldn't even consider X1X.

Yeah I understood the pricing argument.

But the Xbox One X was never advertised as a price competitive alternative, it's going to push sales with better hardware in the short term.
When sales languish, then expect price drops, that's usually how these things go.

Sony will of course attempt to undercut Microsoft with lower prices and game bundles...  Which will attract more gamers. - And good on them, that's what competition is all about, companies reacting to each other not just in price, but features too... And that is good for everyone.

Yep.. the market is price sensitive, but since they still offer X1, I don't think X1X price is an issue (unless they have expectations that are excessively positive).

Ps4 Pro was 400 LAST YEAR, it's available for 340,- already with an additional soon to be announced official price drop, possibly on PSX in December. It's a 40% power difference to PS4Pro, so nothing major. Sony wants 100 dollars more for a 2.3 times as fast console, basically because PS4 was already a decent machine.

Microsoft on the other hand wants 300 dollars more for a 4.6 times as fast console. Not sure what is the better proposition. It's basically the same.

My point still stands. Sony's way to go, with a substantial upgrade for 4K users at a minimal price difference while still respecting the base console and putting their money in game development....over MS's take to basically embarrass base X1 users in the future and putting their money on better looking multiplats..any day of the f'in week!

No man, sorry but that's the thing. PS4 and Pro basically share the same assets as lack of more RAM doesn't allow for bigger textures.

Based on what I've seen on social media and YouTube comments, a lot of people seem to think they have to rebuy their old games. Microsoft needs to clarify that the exact same games people already own will look/run better on Xbox One X. I personally thought they conveyed this clearly but somehow, there is confusion.

It seems to have paid off, great initial sales so far. If it can sustain momentum we could see OR VR come to the X next year.

I kinda feel the xbox division fell into that trap thinking power is everything just because in the beginning of the gen everyone was comparing resolutions and framerates between ps4 n xbox one. The problem is the xbox one was 100 bucks more and at same time it had weaker hardware. Even at 400 bucks without kinect it still was weaker than a ps4 and the perceived value was less compared the ps4.

Microsoft was so tired of loosing in all them Digital Foundry comparisons so they had to top the "half assed" ps4 pro and so they focused on hardware instead of what really matters, games. Just comparing  ps4 2018 lineup to xbox lineup and its looking really spooky especially since none of their games hold any weight.

And this is after 2017 where PS4 had a beast lineup and xbox had the worst year ever.

So yeah i agree with what you said. Switch and base PS4 will wipe the floor with XBOX when it comes to games AND sales this and coming year(s).

Oh no, MS is marketing something; how dare they!

Anyway, to answer your question; no, MS marketing games as being the best on Xbox one x will not affect the sales between PS4 and Xbox One in any meaningful way.