I highly doubt that. Even if they don't constitute a majority, they'd still be a plurality, not a minority. Even if that was true, why would it matter? Most of them would have assimilated into Austrian culture by then.

He's refering to me and he really doesn't know how things are in Austria. We have a political party that is pretty much exclusively built around xenophobia and said party has had consistently good results in elections for decades. Any Austrian who tells you that Austrians don't have a tendency to be xenophobes is simply lying. And because xenophobia is so widespread, it could happen that a law like the recent burqa ban could be passed. A law that has much bigger consequences for Austrians than muslim immigrants, so I called it out for its stupidity.

You just said it, didn't you?

You got moderated before for saying you wished "The Fuhrer" won because of minorities. I know you understand how that's different from the post above. 

Rightfully so if you advocate nazism, the fins did fend off the Soviets so what is really your point?

We have the same political atmosphere in Sweden. The left is describing the Swedish people as xenophobic because we have a similar party to FPÖ with 20% votes (The Sweden Democrats).

But I just think it's bizarre how such supposedly  "xenophobic" and small countries like Austria and Sweden still manages to take in 100,000 thirld world migrants year after year to the point that their own natives now are ónly a decade or two away from ending up in minority.

It's bizarre. To me, a xenephobic people would close its borders and keep its populace homogenous.

But that's not what we are seeing. Austria and Sweden are the two most multicultural countries in the world and increasingly so at a record pace.

So it's unfair to just decribe them "xenophobic". At least nuance the analysis a little and perhaps say that the media, cultural and political elite is out of sync with the will of the common people, forcefully dragging in these masses of migrants against their will by using classic guilt tactics.

If you had your way, that's exactly what would happen. And based on your post history, you are xenophobic.

What do you think would have happened in Germany won WWII? Certainly Nazism and an even worse Holocaust. And you're saying "our independence" when you're referring to Finland? I thought you were from Sweden? If not, you're a migrant, which is ironic considering that you are against migrants coming. If you consider yourself Swedish, then that means that the Swedish people with foreign ancestry would also be considered Swedish.

We have the same political atmosphere in Sweden. The left is describing the Swedish people as xenophobic because we have a similar party to FPÖ with 20% votes (The Sweden Democrats).

But I just think it's bizarre how such supposedly  "xenophobic" and small countries like Austria and Sweden still manages to take in 100,000 thirld world migrants year after year to the point that their own natives now are ónly a decade or two away from ending up in minority.

It's bizarre. To me, a xenephobic people would close its borders and keep its populace homogenous.

But that's not what we are seeing. Austria and Sweden are the two most multicultural countries in the world and increasingly so at a record pace.

So it's unfair to just decribe them "xenophobic". At least nuance the analysis a little and perhaps say that the media, cultural and political elite is out of sync with the will of the common people, forcefully dragging in these masses of migrants against their will by using classic guilt tactics.

I don't necessarily advocate "nazism" and the Holocaust if I wish that Germany had won WW2, just like someone doesn't necessarily advocate communism and the Gulags just because they think the Soviet Army beating Hitler's Germany was important for the outcome of the WW2.

It is true that Finland heroically managed to fend off the Russians in order to preserve our independence, but at a huge cost in loss of manpower, vital territory and enormous war reparations to the Soviet Union for decades to come.

If instead Operation Barbarossa would have been more successfull, Finland would have been able to not just re-conquer and keep the areas that the Soviets unjustly laid claim to in the Winter War of 1939, but we would also have been able to correct a hitorical injustice by liberating all the Finnish tribes living in the Soviet Union, which was about 1 million Finnish people who would have prefered to live in a Finnish state rather than Communist Russia.