Uh, what? It's not a personal attack to repeat something you've said here. Hell, it's not even an attack at all. Unless you think what you said was so silly that it feels like an attack? I could see that.

And an 8 is a fine score, unless you're predisposed to giving games in a franchise 10's and think anything below a 9 is not valid. I guess in that case an 8 might be a "bad" score. Doesn't it have a 55 now though? Yikes.

There are only 10 games below 55 on metacritic of PS4, so 55 is basically an equivalent to 2 and 75 equivalent to a 5.

Looking at the metascore for racing games some very bad games got better grades than GTS while several good racers got low scores... isn't it funny how unthrustworthy are those scores for racers and simulators?

Well, no, that's not really how scores work. A 55 is not the metascore of GTS. There are plenty of reviews for PS4 games lower than a 55. A score of 55 is not equivalent to a 2... it's equivalent to a 55. Or a 5.5 out of 10. And a 75 is not equivalent to a 5, it's a 75, out of 100. Or a 7.5 out of 10. It's not a bad score.

What are these "very bad" racing games that average higher than 75 on metacritic? But then again you have said all GT games are 10/10 for you, so maybe you're the untrustworthy one here?

Wow you act as if there competition falls way behind. But seems graphics are too important to some people. FM7 and PC2 are amazing games. They are filled with content and are worth there price tags. GTS isnt and thats the problem. You can continue to defend it thats fine. They will continue to offer you these type of games. 

Maybe you should read the IGN Review

http://au.ign.com/articles/2017/10/17/gran-turismo-sport-review

At this rate, FM5 > GTS and thats disapointing after 4 years of developement.

There is no real IGN review yet. Just the smaller sister sites. You know why?! Because the big sites (IGN US, Gamespot, Verge, Gameinformer) have agreed on holding the reviews back until the game has the chance to work as intended.

GTS is easily worth the price tag for me, as I’m having more fun with it than any other racing game in the last decade...but Im a serious car nerd and racer and I can totally understand if someone who isn’t thinks that way.

GTS only has only one true problem..lack of content. They did a clean cut. I’m still happy they have released it now instead of in 2 years time when they have caught up with modelling. Ok, they really need to get the offline saving and server stability fixed too.

pC2 and F7 have other problems. Be it much worse controller play of PC2, bad AI, bugs and general unpolished state of the game..lacking physics and wheel support of Forza 7 and loot boxes, bad lighting system with exaggerated colours and sound, bad online and A.I.

I don’t have to read the review...they all say the same. The game looks and plays brilliantly, it just doesn’t have enough content yet. And this is only in comparison to the competition as GTS still offers easily hundreds of hours played for its 60 bucks.

Well, no, that's not really how scores work. A 55 is not the metascore of GTS. There are plenty of reviews for PS4 games lower than a 55. A score of 55 is not equivalent to a 2... it's equivalent to a 55. Or a 5.5 out of 10. And a 75 is not equivalent to a 5, it's a 75, out of 100. Or a 7.5 out of 10. It's not a bad score.

What are these "very bad" racing games that average higher than 75 on metacritic? But then again you have said all GT games are 10/10 for you, so maybe you're the untrustworthy one here?

http://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/release-date/new-releases/ps4/metascore

On the recent launch there is very few.

on a scale of 0 to 10, 5 being a mean point, would point to average/mediocre. So can you say that a game that reaches a 5 is average?

Going by metacritic that scale is shifted and there is no 0 on it, so you are more likely looking from 2 to 10, the average goes to 6 with very little content actually being there. If you were really looking at the ful score.

So does XCom2 deserves a 9.4?

Very bad? I said worse. Do you really have a hard time using words or you just try to make then mean other things to try and support your point?

Never claimed I'm unbiased about GT or anything at all.

https://www.polygon.com/2014/10/28/7083373/look-at-this-chart-of-average-metacritic-scores-what-happened-in-2007

Isn't it funny that reviewers score on metacritic average collectivelly to a 65-75 interval, with the most recent on the link showing it close to 73.

So that would put that the average game is on the 70 branch, but going by your totally unbiased analysis 75 is very good and a deserving score. Do you still believe anyone think you are the unbiased, console neutral guy?

How was that Titanfall game of the generation before you played all games of the generation or before even being a full 2 years on the gen? And you have the balls to come here talk about scores on unplayed games and unbiased opinion.

How was that Titanfall game of the generation before you played all games of the generation or before even being a full 2 years on the gen? And you have the balls to come here talk about scores on unplayed games and unbiased opinion.

There is no real IGN review yet. Just the smaller sister sites. You know why?! Because the big sites (IGN US, Gamespot, Verge, Gameinformer) have agreed on holding the reviews back until the game has the chance to work as intended.

GTS is easily worth the price tag for me, as I’m having more fun with it than any other racing game in the last decade...but Im a serious car nerd and racer and I can totally understand if someone who isn’t thinks that way.

GTS only has only one true problem..lack of content. They did a clean cut. I’m still happy they have released it now instead of in 2 years time when they have caught up with modelling. Ok, they really need to get the offline saving and server stability fixed too.

pC2 and F7 have other problems. Be it much worse controller play of PC2, bad AI, bugs and general unpolished state of the game..lacking physics and wheel support of Forza 7 and loot boxes, bad lighting system with exaggerated colours and sound, bad online and A.I.

I don’t have to read the review...they all say the same. The game looks and plays brilliantly, it just doesn’t have enough content yet. And this is only in comparison to the competition as GTS still offers easily hundreds of hours played for its 60 bucks.

Yes GTS have to be reviewed as GTS not GT7, want to repeat it another 5 times?

It have more play time than most 60USD games so is content the problem?

Have you read their conclusion (ign) because yes they said the same, great content on what offered, missing content compared to others.

Funny part is he using it as a comparison to Forza and PC... the comment on the review is that polish and detail on GTS is top class, not equalled by any, just that FM7 and PC2 aren't draw with crayon... so he was very clear in putting there really is a big difference.

http://www.metacritic.com/browse/games/release-date/new-releases/ps4/metascore

On the recent launch there is very few.

on a scale of 0 to 10, 5 being a mean point, would point to average/mediocre. So can you say that a game that reaches a 5 is average?

Going by metacritic that scale is shifted and there is no 0 on it, so you are more likely looking from 2 to 10, the average goes to 6 with very little content actually being there. If you were really looking at the ful score.

So does XCom2 deserves a 9.4?

Very bad? I said worse. Do you really have a hard time using words or you just try to make then mean other things to try and support your point?

Never claimed I'm unbiased about GT or anything at all.

https://www.polygon.com/2014/10/28/7083373/look-at-this-chart-of-average-metacritic-scores-what-happened-in-2007

Isn't it funny that reviewers score on metacritic average collectivelly to a 65-75 interval, with the most recent on the link showing it close to 73.

So that would put that the average game is on the 70 branch, but going by your totally unbiased analysis 75 is very good and a deserving score. Do you still believe anyone think you are the unbiased, console neutral guy?

How was that Titanfall game of the generation before you played all games of the generation or before even being a full 2 years on the gen? And you have the balls to come here talk about scores on unplayed games and unbiased opinion.