Errorist76 said:
There is no real IGN review yet. Just the smaller sister sites. You know why?! Because the big sites (IGN US, Gamespot, Verge, Gameinformer) have agreed on holding the reviews back until the game has the chance to work as intended. GTS is easily worth the price tag for me, as I’m having more fun with it than any other racing game in the last decade...but Im a serious car nerd and racer and I can totally understand if someone who isn’t thinks that way. GTS only has only one true problem..lack of content. They did a clean cut. I’m still happy they have released it now instead of in 2 years time when they have caught up with modelling. Ok, they really need to get the offline saving and server stability fixed too. pC2 and F7 have other problems. Be it much worse controller play of PC2, bad AI, bugs and general unpolished state of the game..lacking physics and wheel support of Forza 7 and loot boxes, bad lighting system with exaggerated colours and sound, bad online and A.I. I don’t have to read the review...they all say the same. The game looks and plays brilliantly, it just doesn’t have enough content yet. And this is only in comparison to the competition as GTS still offers easily hundreds of hours played for its 60 bucks. |
GTS took over 4 years to make, and they are charging full price for a game with less than half the content and prebaked weather/lighitng something FM5 suffered also from reviews, atleast FM5 didnt take 4 years to make and still achieved the same. I hope in your case the extra DLC is free.
You also talk down on its competition acting as if the visual differences are night and day? (Funny because GTS doesnt offer dynamic Night and Day) FM7 and PC2 offers great visuals and sound and theres nothing BAD about there lighting model.
Sure GTS has better lighting and the cars look slightly better but at what extra cost? Can you ram into a tire wall in GTS and see the tires react to the crash like in FM7? GTS car damage falls short aswell and the lack of road details seem flat. Also the sound in GTS isnt class leading mentioned by many reviewers. I could go on and on about where GTS falls short to other racers. The fact you stick to the only things GTS has done slightly better is funny because i can name many things it does slightly worse and at times simply worse.
Since you seem to love visuals over everything else, i bet you are excited for FM7 on X1X.. Lets wait and see shall we.
DonFerrari said:
Yes GTS have to be reviewed as GTS not GT7, want to repeat it another 5 times? It have more play time than most 60USD games so is content the problem?
Have you read their conclusion (ign) because yes they said the same, great content on what offered, missing content compared to others.
Funny part is he using it as a comparison to Forza and PC... the comment on the review is that polish and detail on GTS is top class, not equalled by any, just that FM7 and PC2 aren't draw with crayon... so he was very clear in putting there really is a big difference. |
Mate your arguing agasint the majority. I dont need to debate this with you. The reviews speak for themselves. As of right now, GTS is sitting on a 75 Meta, its not a bad score however compared that to its competition it falls behind by a fair shot. You said you treat every GT game a 10/10, well that says something about your opinion in these debates.
Tell me, do you think GTS is a 10/10 game?
