bigtakilla said:
Same way we got Osama Bin Laden. Hell, he's in parades all the time. |
It took a decade to get Osama Bin Laden. Also, Osama Bin Laden didn't have an army of over 2 million people in active duty.
bigtakilla said:
Same way we got Osama Bin Laden. Hell, he's in parades all the time. |
It took a decade to get Osama Bin Laden. Also, Osama Bin Laden didn't have an army of over 2 million people in active duty.
VGPolyglot said:
It took a decade to get Osama Bin Laden. Also, Osama Bin Laden didn't have an army of over 2 million people in active duty. |
Are you talking about the starved, ill equiped military? What would they do exactly?
bigtakilla said:
Are you talking about the starved, ill equiped military? What would they do exactly? |
They'll see that they're getting invaded, and they're either going to flee, or fight. There'd probably be tons of guerrilla movements, especially considering the terrain.
VGPolyglot said:
They'll see that they're getting invaded, and they're either going to flee, or fight. There'd probably be tons of guerrilla movements, especially considering the terrain. |
that's why we remain in small units. Not straight up invade with our military. Seal Team 6 alone went in to get Osama. After the attack, get China to pressure the new leader and build an army up on the border between North and South Korea. Keeping in mind that most people in this 10 million man army are drafted, I don't think most would mind a cease fire.
bigtakilla said:
that's why we remain in small units. Not straight up invade with our military. Seal Team 6 alone went in to get Osama. After the attack, get China to pressure the new leader and build an army up on the border between North and South Korea. Keeping in mind that most people in this 10 million man army are drafted, I don't think most would mind a cease fire. |
Why would China agree to go along with it? They don't want to deal with a refugee crisis.
VGPolyglot said:
Why would China agree to go along with it? They don't want to deal with a refugee crisis. |
That is certainly an issue they will need to take into account, but that's also why we have people in charge of this stuff.
bigtakilla said:
That is certainly an issue they will need to take into account, but that's also why we have people in charge of this stuff. |
Also, China would not want a US-allied North Korea, so they allow the current situation to go on so that doesn't happen.
VGPolyglot said:
Also, China would not want a US-allied North Korea, so they allow the current situation to go on so that doesn't happen. |
Well, there's work arounds. Like having the UN set up santions on imports to North Korea. China doesn't usually fight the UN, even with its passive aggressiveness of the current situation.
bigtakilla said:
Well, there's work arounds. Like having the UN set up santions on imports to North Korea. China doesn't usually fight the UN, even with its passive aggressiveness of the current situation. |
We already do that.
CaptainExplosion said:
So they don't want to nuke us? |
Why would China want to do that? The US is its biggest export partner.