| xl-klaudkil said: They have enough of Uncharted, there working on the last of us 2 and then hopefully something totally different. ( kuch kuch guerilla killzone then horizon zero dawn) |
@Bolded: What are you talking about? ND isn't going to work on any of those titles.
Zekkyou said:
The MC is a couple of points off where i'd have guessed, but 85 seems reasonable for what's effectively an AA offering from ND. Compared to their normal games it's shorter, more self contained, and recycles UC4's technology rather than attempting to push the envelope. It even comes with the same multi-player as UC4. If this was a normal ND project i'd agree 100% though, 85 would be very low.
TLL had the majority of the UC4 team working on it, just for less time (seems to have taken about 15 months). Doesn't really change your point, but worth mentioning. |
From what I saw on news the team on it was very small and working for less than 12 months in general. It was meant as an DLC expansion that gone big. So they really recycled a lot to make a "small game" and utilize the team that would be idle.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
From what I saw on news the team on it was very small and working for less than 12 months in general. It was meant as an DLC expansion that gone big. So they really recycled a lot to make a "small game" and utilize the team that would be idle. |
@bolded: Please. Only post factual stuff.
| John2290 said: Also....digitally downloaded's review. What the fuck was that? I don't mind the 70 score but I don't want to hear what you like in gaming dammit, give me some information on the game without your bias thrown in. From review "But I like my games to have narrative, and I like games that get me thinking. I like my games to have purpose, and I find The Lost Legacy to be a very purposeless game. It’s fun, I enjoyed my time with it. I doubt I’ll ever feel inspired to play it again, much less remember it." What the fuck is this shit? Just after praising the game for its great mechanics and level design. Metacritic needs to vet these reviewers. |
I hate this kind of review.
Comparing, bias review, not reviewing how the game is, like you said telling us on their review what they want the game to be on their liking. I hope there will be a criteria who and whom that can create a review.. They should base it on how the gameplay works, is it broken and information on the game because AFAIK that is there job.
| Pinkie_pie said: 85 seems very low for a naughty dog game. ill still buy it day one |
85 is a great score.
We have to stop measuring Naughty Dog by an insane standard.
There were people disapointed that Uncharted 4 didnt score higher than 94. Like literally disapointed.
ThisGuyFooks said:
85 is a great score. We have to stop measuring Naughty Dog by an insane standard. There were people disapointed that Uncharted 4 didnt score higher than 94. Like literally disapointed. |
Quite crazy... And although it was a great game I don't really think it disapointed nor deserved more than 94. Also I had more fun on UC 1 to 3
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
| John2290 said: Also....digitally downloaded's review. What the fuck was that? I don't mind the 70 score but I don't want to hear what you like in gaming dammit, give me some information on the game without your bias thrown in. From review "But I like my games to have narrative, and I like games that get me thinking. I like my games to have purpose, and I find The Lost Legacy to be a very purposeless game. It’s fun, I enjoyed my time with it. I doubt I’ll ever feel inspired to play it again, much less remember it." What the fuck is this shit? Just after praising the game for its great mechanics and level design. Metacritic needs to vet these reviewers. |
Vet them yourself. Go to Opencritic and unclick on any reviewers you don't like in your personal tab.
| John2290 said: Also....digitally downloaded's review. What the fuck was that? I don't mind the 70 score but I don't want to hear what you like in gaming dammit, give me some information on the game without your bias thrown in. From review "But I like my games to have narrative, and I like games that get me thinking. I like my games to have purpose, and I find The Lost Legacy to be a very purposeless game. It’s fun, I enjoyed my time with it. I doubt I’ll ever feel inspired to play it again, much less remember it." What the fuck is this shit? Just after praising the game for its great mechanics and level design. Metacritic needs to vet these reviewers. |
I haven't read the review yet(I'm going to right now) but that honestly doesn't sound bad ...
You say you don't like bias reviews, but every review ever is biased. I'd rather have a review that acts like a decontruction or analysis of why a game does or doesn't work, then "You jump on a building, you drive a car, you play as Chloe" etc
Edit : Just read the review. It was pretty great, aside from a few things.
Naughty dog is on another leveL. The only developers I consider better or competitive with them is rockstar and cd projekt red.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
