Zekkyou said:
The MC is a couple of points off where i'd have guessed, but 85 seems reasonable for what's effectively an AA offering from ND. Compared to their normal games it's shorter, more self contained, and recycles UC4's technology rather than attempting to push the envelope. It even comes with the same multi-player as UC4. If this was a normal ND project i'd agree 100% though, 85 would be very low.
TLL had the majority of the UC4 team working on it, just for less time (seems to have taken about 15 months). Doesn't really change your point, but worth mentioning. |
From what I saw on news the team on it was very small and working for less than 12 months in general. It was meant as an DLC expansion that gone big. So they really recycled a lot to make a "small game" and utilize the team that would be idle.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
