By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Capcom: Monster Hunter XX Switch version is another test to evaluate our support for Switch

DonFerrari on 04 August 2017
Mnementh said:
DonFerrari said:

Totally agree with you, and is normal that some genres sell better in one platform than another (much simple to dance on Wii than on PS4 in fact).

Was just saying that the fact that the game being a year old port and kinda inferior doesn't totally justify a bomb. We know for fact that Nintendo gamers are picky on this... we had Rayman issues because a lot of Nintendo fan said they would go against it because it was hold for release together with other editions.

I personally would get XX for Switch, if Capcom gets their act together and localize this. Only that they declare it a test irritates me. As I said before, they should declare World the test, because World actually experiments with a new direction in multiple ways.

Well that is semantic and I can see why it upsets you and others. But I actually think both are tests even if they only name one as such.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."