psychicscubadiver said:
Posting links to articles and swearing isn't really an argument.
I have put forward a point, gotten consencious from a semi-random selection of people which confirms what most of the people in this thread have commented on, and used some clear and easy-to-follow logic. You may personally disagree on the semantics and prefer to split hairs, but does not make what I've said less valid.
|
Im not going to butt in in the terms of wether this is actual theft or actually copyright infrigement(couldnt care less, really), but I just wanted to point out one thing:Having the concenssus of the general public about the meaning of a word or what the word should mean does not make it true.Quite the contrary actually.Just because most people believe something is right does not make it right.Water is water, but if the society comes out and say "no, water is wine", it dosent make water into wine.It just says the the masses are ignorant.A similar example can be made about religion.Its not because many people believe in a god that makes necessarialy that god real.
Same for the definition of a word.A word means what a word means.Its what it was made in the first place to mean, what is written on the dictionary and no, it does not depand of the semantics of the situation.It is what it is on the dictionary, or whoever its definiton is written.The meaning of the word could change, but for that to happen, it needed to officially change, as in the meaning on the source material needed to change first.But thats another discussion altogether.