By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
psychicscubadiver said:
potato_hamster said:

What evidence is that, exactly? Your anecdote? Your random assertion that any random on the street would agree with you? Besides, none of that even matters because you're using a very generous interpretation of one type of "identity theft" that may involve copying something and equating the concept of identity theft in its entirety to copyright infringement. They're two different sections of the law for a reason. They're not the same.


Shrug. They are the  same to me and the 15 people in my work place that I polled. You're kinda dealing only on your own opinion.

Well I guess that settles it then, huh? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum

Ohh shit. Looks like logic and reason bombed in and fucked with your day. Again.