By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Any Nintendo fans with ill will for Sony?

TheWPCTraveler said:
pokoko said:

People like you who complain about what other people like and try to tell others that they're enjoying themselves wrong are probably the biggest reason Sony's success makes me so happy.  

I'm not kidding, either.  It pleases me greatly.

I've noticed lately that you've been rather harsh on the Nintendo fanbase, due in part to the more radical and biased elements of which Pyro As Bill is one of them. It's just an observation on my part that amuses me.

Hey Miguel, if you're reading this, please don't ban me for flaming kthxbai

Karen is best girl :P

Probably my least favorite type of "gamer" is the elitist kind who thinks that only they are entitled to define gaming itself.  As soon as someone tells me that something isn't a "real game" or whatever, then I know we're going to be at odds.  It's just the silliest, most ridiculous thing to me, especially since I remembers back when people used to say that video-games weren't real games, either.  Who actually gives a rat's fuzzy ass about a label, anyway?  What I do know is that millions of people enjoy these "not real games", which is what matters.

That most of these people congregate to Nintendo is true, unfortunately.  



Around the Network
pokoko said:

 As soon as someone tells me that something isn't a "real game" or whatever, then I know we're going to be at odds.

Smartphone users aren't real gamers.  I need my buttons!



pokoko said:
TheWPCTraveler said:

I've noticed lately that you've been rather harsh on the Nintendo fanbase, due in part to the more radical and biased elements of which Pyro As Bill is one of them. It's just an observation on my part that amuses me.

Hey Miguel, if you're reading this, please don't ban me for flaming kthxbai

Karen is best girl :P

Probably my least favorite type of "gamer" is the elitist kind who thinks that only they are entitled to defining gaming itself.  As soon as someone tells me that something isn't a "real game" or whatever, then I know we're going to be at odds.  It's just the silliest, most ridiculous thing to me, especially since I remembers back when people used to say that video-games weren't real games, either.  Who actually gives a rat's fuzzy ass about a label, anyway?  What I do know is that millions of people enjoy these "not real games", which is what matters.

That most of these people congregate to Nintendo is true, unfortunately.  

Madden isn't a real game.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

No, both companies have produced great, but very different, games over the years.



Salty about MH:World which is going to be more popular than people think.



Around the Network
PEEPer0nni said:
Salty about MH:World which is going to be more popular than people think.

MH:Word is eventually coming out on PC right?  No loss for me.



sethnintendo said:
PEEPer0nni said:
Salty about MH:World which is going to be more popular than people think.

MH:Word is eventually coming out on PC right?  No loss for me.

6 months later



PEEPer0nni said:
sethnintendo said:

MH:Word is eventually coming out on PC right?  No loss for me.

6 months later

Then I'll wait another year or so and pick it up on a steam summer or winter sale. 



S.T.A.G.E. said:
RolStoppable said:
The only illwill I have about that particular situation mentioned in the original post is directed at the people who consider Microsoft's attempt to buy out Nintendo a scummy decision while they don't think about Sony in the same way. Sony too tried to get control over Nintendo's first party games, so Nintendo faced the same choice they would later have to make in regards to Microsoft:

1. Become an underling of an electronics giant/software giant.
2. Remain independent, but face increased competition due to the inevitable entry that results from turning down the offer.

Sony is no better than Microsoft in regards to that, but Sony tends to have the image of a good guy.

Nintendo being owned by either brand would be a tragedy, but in Microsofts hands would result in loss of creativity and becoming a shell of its former self. The worst Sony would do to Nintendo, potentially would be to give their games a decent storyline. LOL ....regardless...I dont think either should own Nintendo as they are perfect on their own.

He's acting like Nintendo are some angels from heaven. They were complete cunts with third parties even in the SNES days. Sony were much more friendly with them, which is why the PS4 is where it is today, and the PS1 and 2 were where they were.



KLAMarine said:
Ruler said:

Like all companies

Sony's been the greater of these evils as of late...

Yeah providing the best overall games line up of any console and awesome hardware at a great price. So evil!

Miyamotoo said:
Kerotan said:

No they're last gen now. Switch has released, the successor to the wii u and 3ds. Gen 9!

So you try to say that PS4 and XB1 are last gen!? :D

Officially last and current generation is 8. gen (Wii U/PS4/XB1). Switch is in some strange limbo, we can say that Switch is just Nintendos 9. gen, but other current consoles are all still 8 gen. So if last and current gen for most of consoles on market is 8. gen, previous gen was 7. gen (PS3, Xbox 360 and Wii).

Yes I am saying that. But if you're going to seperate it and say XB/PS4/PS4pro are current gen but nintendo are sperate then it still proves my point. Current gen for nintendo is the switch. The succesor of their last gen hardware wii u and 3ds. And if you're going to say 3ds isn't because it still gets a handful of games well so does ps3 and that's not current gen. PS2 was also supported after the ps3 released. That doesn't mean anything.