By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - MS hiring for 'next-gen AAA' game 'similar to Horizon Zero Dawn'

DonFerrari said:
jason1637 said:

The more the better.

Horizon would be a lot better with multiplayer.

Yes, sure... a game about a girl that is totally alone on her choice being MP, that would suck. Keep your MPs out of my games... at most I would accept Co-Op with the guy that helped alloy on missions.

It would be cool if it had a multiplayer mode like evolve a group of player vs someoen as big robot. Would be cool if they added guns and had a team deathmatch type mode.



Around the Network
jason1637 said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes, sure... a game about a girl that is totally alone on her choice being MP, that would suck. Keep your MPs out of my games... at most I would accept Co-Op with the guy that helped alloy on missions.

It would be cool if it had a multiplayer mode like evolve a group of player vs someoen as big robot. Would be cool if they added guns and had a team deathmatch type mode.

Because all games need to have MP and with the same modes right?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:
jason1637 said:

It would be cool if it had a multiplayer mode like evolve a group of player vs someoen as big robot. Would be cool if they added guns and had a team deathmatch type mode.

Because all games need to have MP and with the same modes right?

Its not a must have but i personally play lots of multiplay shooters so i would like more games to have gunplay PvP multiplayer.



jason1637 said:
DonFerrari said:

Because all games need to have MP and with the same modes right?

Its not a must have but i personally play lots of multiplay shooters so i would like more games to have gunplay PvP multiplayer.

Good for you, I never play MP so I see no point in they expending money on making it, and you already have a plethora of shooters to choose.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

jason1637 said:
DonFerrari said:

Because all games need to have MP and with the same modes right?

Its not a must have but i personally play lots of multiplay shooters so i would like more games to have gunplay PvP multiplayer.

Your games comprise 99% of the market and almost wiped out classic video game genres throughout 7th gen.

 

Others aren't allowed to have genres that don't placate to testosteroned  out immature western males?

 

I had to endure nothing but lame versus military and space Marine shooters all last gen which lasted almost a decade. An RPG or adventure game or two without guns and competing won't kill you.



Around the Network
exdeath said:
jason1637 said:
This means that the artstyle will be like Horizon not the gameplay. Hope it's a open world FPS with PVP multiplayer. More shooter please MS the last shooter was Gears and that was in October.

Because there aren't enough of those...

Can people enjoy games anymore without bumping penises and competing?  

 

You guys ruin every game that comes out with this unhealthy obsession with everything being versus (see The Division ruined multiple times until all gear was equally boring and useless because of people whining about DZ and PVP).

 

I swear you are the same type of person who's looking to start something revving at me in some POS 350Z or slammed Infinity when I'm just minding my own business in a CTS V.

 

Why is everything always about competing or having something to prove?  Can you actually enjoy single player story rich games like Horizon Zero Dawn or The Last of Us unless there is a versus mode for you to be "pro" and "pwn n00bs"? Probably not.

 

If that's all you want you don't deserve games like Horizon Zero Dawn.

 

One decent bit of favorable news for this god forsaken console, the type of game sorely missing and desperately needed on Xbox, and you're already asking for it to be just another dumb versus shooter. And this is why the platform is hopeless and destined to die off.

What on earth are you on about? Believe it or not, some people enjoy both story rich single-player games and playing versus without "pwning n00bs". I play alot of online versus games just to relax, not to be a pro or "bump penises" :D

Take Quantum Break for example. A great, great and rich story but man there should have been a multiplayer, co-op horde or something. It would have added so much value and make the most of the game mechanics. Nobody has to play multiplayer but I can't think of a reason how it would be better not to have an option to play it.



KiigelHeart said:
exdeath said:

Because there aren't enough of those...

Can people enjoy games anymore without bumping penises and competing?  

 

You guys ruin every game that comes out with this unhealthy obsession with everything being versus (see The Division ruined multiple times until all gear was equally boring and useless because of people whining about DZ and PVP).

 

I swear you are the same type of person who's looking to start something revving at me in some POS 350Z or slammed Infinity when I'm just minding my own business in a CTS V.

 

Why is everything always about competing or having something to prove?  Can you actually enjoy single player story rich games like Horizon Zero Dawn or The Last of Us unless there is a versus mode for you to be "pro" and "pwn n00bs"? Probably not.

 

If that's all you want you don't deserve games like Horizon Zero Dawn.

 

One decent bit of favorable news for this god forsaken console, the type of game sorely missing and desperately needed on Xbox, and you're already asking for it to be just another dumb versus shooter. And this is why the platform is hopeless and destined to die off.

What on earth are you on about? Believe it or not, some people enjoy both story rich single-player games and playing versus without "pwning n00bs". I play alot of online versus games just to relax, not to be a pro or "bump penises" :D

Take Quantum Break for example. A great, great and rich story but man there should have been a multiplayer, co-op horde or something. It would have added so much value and make the most of the game mechanics. Nobody has to play multiplayer but I can't think of a reason how it would be better not to have an option to play it.

How about it not being necessary, it diverting time from devs, costing money and many times being generic?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:

How about it not being necessary, it diverting time from devs, costing money and many times being generic?

Well it wasn't "necessary" for Quantum Break either but it would have added much more value and reason to play it after completing the story. Whether it's generic or not is up to devs and as a consumer I don't give a shit how much money it costs. Diverting time from devs is a good point but it can be done, Uncharted 4 has a great campaign and a good multiplayer, no?

I'm all for having an option to play multiplayer and hopefully Microsoft will deliver it for their upcoming games.



Xbox fans won't appreciate it.



Azzanation said:

I dont believe Xbox is using Gens anymore. X1X and its sequal will most likely run the same games. 

I'm not buying that "no more gens" talk. Why would they want to be stuck forever in a gen were they are seen as lagging behind Sony? They would have to fight an uphill battle, a new gen is a fresh start that puts everyone in an even ground to compete. And it's not like they are improving, this year their disavantage only grew. Sony would be more benefited if this gen lasted forever.

Also, a new gen is the shiny new product. It doesn't matter how many X1s they release, a PS5 would look more advanced in the eyes of the consumer, even if it really wasn't. The older models would also held back the more potent X1 against a new generation opponent (that would have full backwards compatibility).