method114 said:
DonFerrari said:
Hope the jewel don't overcost the TV
|
Nah that's one of the great things. James Avery is all silver jewelry very cheap stuff (compared to real jewelry). I'll spend $80 tops.
|
Then it's a good method =] no pun intended.
method114 said:
DonFerrari said:
Well since you already have 60" and several PS4Pro titles won't really get to 4k, you can wait for it to be a little cheaper or buy a smaller 4k on the very cheap side to enjoy the extra res now and then sell both TVs and buy a competent big 4k when more feasible
Run similar, so I traded my 42" plasma to a 32" LCD that my wife uses on the kitchen and have a 21" loaned to my niece.
Well if that is what you values in gaming hope it serves your needs and give you a blast
|
lol dude 32" TV in the kitchen. I don't even know how I could get that to work at my house. Maybe hang in in the dining area.
|
Well it was that or keep it as secondary TV on the main living room for me to play while my kid watches his things.
Nem said: In a nutshell what is wrong with the industry. 60fps is more impactful than a few more pixels you can hardly notice. Do they care? Nope. They don't care about gameplay. They only care about making money. It they could sell you a rock and say its infinite K the one your eye can see, they would. The problem are all the people that don't care. The ones who just want to play a game and not worry wether it could be better. That passivenes is the worst as it makes the rest of us have to conform to mediocrity. |
Yes game creators, the ones that creates gameplay doesn't care about it, sure... and everyone that have a different taste is wrong.
And considering you like games from a company that put very little money and charge you the same price as others, having a very big margin and product saying that the problem are the others conforming to mediocrity is funny.