method114 said:
Nah that's one of the great things. James Avery is all silver jewelry very cheap stuff (compared to real jewelry). I'll spend $80 tops. |
Then it's a good method =] no pun intended.
method114 said:
lol dude 32" TV in the kitchen. I don't even know how I could get that to work at my house. Maybe hang in in the dining area. |
Well it was that or keep it as secondary TV on the main living room for me to play while my kid watches his things.
| Nem said: In a nutshell what is wrong with the industry. 60fps is more impactful than a few more pixels you can hardly notice. Do they care? Nope. They don't care about gameplay. They only care about making money. It they could sell you a rock and say its infinite K the one your eye can see, they would. The problem are all the people that don't care. The ones who just want to play a game and not worry wether it could be better. That passivenes is the worst as it makes the rest of us have to conform to mediocrity. |
Yes game creators, the ones that creates gameplay doesn't care about it, sure... and everyone that have a different taste is wrong.
And considering you like games from a company that put very little money and charge you the same price as others, having a very big margin and product saying that the problem are the others conforming to mediocrity is funny.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







