TH3-D0S3R said: I would say that a Switch could be appealing to casual audiences, specifically parents with kids. Recently, I always see parents needing to buy a distraction for their kids so they can play games on long drives and not be obnoxious. The number one device I see around myself that parents buy for young kids is an iPad. The Switch resembles closely to an iPhone/iPad sort of device, and the games on it would intrigue kids like they are intrigued by home consoles and handhelds. On top of that, $300 competes very well against expensive tablets like the iPad. Personally I think if it can continue the core gamer/family friendly gaming device, this thing could possibly (personally I say easily) beat the Wii. The PS2/DS sales I think are actually achievable, but not likely. For now I think Nintendo is in a good place and keep the momentum of the Switch at full speed. |
The problem there is like you said ... most parents already have a tablet for their kids.
Switch is going to have to make hay with an older audience with more disposable income who reeeeeally want more complex game experiences than a tablet can offer, I think the kids market is less reliable for Nintendo going forward because mobile appeals so much to kids, and parents love it too.
My parents would've been over the moon if NES and Super NES games cost $0 instead of $60-$70 a pop, so it's not hard to see why parents love just giving their kids a tablet and letting them sit immersed in that for hours and hours on end.
$300 can buy you a pretty high end Android tablet too ... it doesn't neccessarily have to be an iPad. Even $150 really, you can get yourself a solid tablet for the kiddies that will play cartoons, thousands of games, take photos, etc. etc. etc.