By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Is this Phil Spencer's final test for Microsoft? Is his job on the line?

 

Could Phil Spencer's job be on the line?

Yes. 132 53.66%
 
No. 114 46.34%
 
Total:246
thismeintiel said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

"suddenly so coveted" as if he wasn't one of the loudest users tooting the PS4 power horn when these consoles launched. That salt, though. A more accurate quip would be suddenly irrelevant power crown :)

We're not the hypocrites who said power doesn't matter and now act like its the end all, be all.  

Power, like B/C, is always nice.  Just like the PS3 days.  But it means jack all without something to back it up and an attractive price.

No salt involved.

Your spin doesn't hold any water when there's not anyone really acting as if it's the end all be all. Not here anyway, I'm speaking to the general Xbox user here at this community. You can be excited about a beast console and yet at the same time not think graphics are everything. But that has zero to do with all the threads and posts we saw about how much power DID matter every time an Xbone game was 900p versus a 1080p PS4 version. But hey, now power is completely irrelevant. Wonder why.

Xbox fans here prefer Xbox for the games, system features like BC and Game Pass, controller, UI, network, etc. Now we still have that, and the most powerful console ever. It's exciting times. The only thing lost here is the ability for one fan base to gloat about small power differences. Hence the salt, "suddenly so coveted" LOL. Enjoy the last word, not gonna waste more time with you on this :)



Around the Network
Turkish said:
VideoGameAccountant said:

First, RolStoppable's post is top notch. 10/10.

If you want to know what Microsoft will do, ask yourself, "Who is Microsoft's biggest threat." The answer is Apple.

Microsoft does not sell to customers but to other businesses. Microsoft would go to Dell and say "Hey, don't worry about that pesky operating system. We got it covered." So Microsoft would sell Windows to Dell to be used on their computers. This is why Windows sucked so much. It was for the benefit of the business, not the customer. As an aside, this is why Microsoft has struggled in every consumer business it has tried. Sony has done well because they are a consumer electronics company.

Now, Sony isn't a threat to Microsoft. There is no reason to fight for the living room and Sony as a company has been gutted to the point to where they are basically a video game company. But Apple is a threat. With mobile computing, there isn't a need to sell an OS. The OS is a part of the device. Everyone using smart phones and tablets is a huge blow to Microsoft. So everything in the company is going to be used to defend windows,

If you want another example of this, look at Zune. Microsoft pushed Zune as their media player until Apple ended the iPod. Then no more Zune. Remember the gap from Windows Vista to Windows 7. It seemed like forever. The Microsoft kept making OS back to back. Microsoft has been tuning Windows to be more smartphone friendly.

XBox's future will be to defend Windows. I expect that future XBox machines will be Window machines. Scorpio could be a start of this with its emphasis on power (first thing they unveiled about it). Anything Microsoft will do is to defend Windows. For instance, the OP mentioned, "Why would Phil release XBox games on PC." Because this draw people to Windows. The future of XBox is Windows because Windows is under assault from smartphones.

Playstation isn't even Sony's biggest business, Sony is making more profit now since over a decade, Kaz turned the company around.

Xbox' biggest threat is Playstation, don't kid yourself, Xbox is in the living room. Xbox isn't competing with Apple TV or iPhone. Microsoft lost to Apple and Google in the mobile space, they're losing to Sony in the living room. MS is big in the cloud and corporate business but they have other competitors there.

I agree about Xbox machines being Windows machines in the future, but nothing's gonna stop the decline of the PC market. Xbox games on PC doesn't draw in new people, PC gaming is already big. Windows Store isn't doing too hot compared to Steam, MS has good intentions but they ruin it with things like UWP.

First, I never said they would be successful. Just that they would do it. '

Second, I'd ask yourself what is more important to Microsoft: Windows or XBox? Which would Microsoft save first? The answer is obvious. 

The battle for the living room is pointless. It's like fighting over who has the best clown shoes. Who cares if yours are the best, why are you wearing those in the first place? XBox only exists because Sony WAS a threat. Sony is now a gutted company and Apple is a new threat. If you think Microsoft is in the console market to win it, then you don't understand Microsoft's business. If the company was so concerned about XBox, why has it been a big money pit? It's not meant to be profitable but to fight off the threat from Sony. Now, Sony isn't that big of a threat because mobile exists.

Lastly, in terms of portability, Sony's net income has declined from 15 to 16 its mostly propped up by the financial services business, so I wouldn't say they are killing it. 



Visit my site for more

Known as Smashchu in a former life

LudicrousSpeed said:
thismeintiel said:

We're not the hypocrites who said power doesn't matter and now act like its the end all, be all.  

Power, like B/C, is always nice.  Just like the PS3 days.  But it means jack all without something to back it up and an attractive price.

No salt involved.

Your spin doesn't hold any water when there's not anyone really acting as if it's the end all be all. Not here anyway, I'm speaking to the general Xbox user here at this community. You can be excited about a beast console and yet at the same time not think graphics are everything. But that has zero to do with all the threads and posts we saw about how much power DID matter every time an Xbone game was 900p versus a 1080p PS4 version. But hey, now power is completely irrelevant. Wonder why.

Xbox fans here prefer Xbox for the games, system features like BC and Game Pass, controller, UI, network, etc. Now we still have that, and the most powerful console ever. It's exciting times. The only thing lost here is the ability for one fan base to gloat about small power differences. Hence the salt, "suddenly so coveted" LOL. Enjoy the last word, not gonna waste more time with you on this :)

Outside of the top three what are Xbox games really? There's no identity. Nintnedo and Sony fans can tell you what the mission statement of their company of choice is and they continue to deliver because they both have successsful formulas while striving to find new ones. As someone on a podcast said, "it can't be the games"... it has to be the system features.Those are the true exclusives they look for. That said, yes Microsoft does make a great interface.



S.T.A.G.E. said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

Your spin doesn't hold any water when there's not anyone really acting as if it's the end all be all. Not here anyway, I'm speaking to the general Xbox user here at this community. You can be excited about a beast console and yet at the same time not think graphics are everything. But that has zero to do with all the threads and posts we saw about how much power DID matter every time an Xbone game was 900p versus a 1080p PS4 version. But hey, now power is completely irrelevant. Wonder why.

Xbox fans here prefer Xbox for the games, system features like BC and Game Pass, controller, UI, network, etc. Now we still have that, and the most powerful console ever. It's exciting times. The only thing lost here is the ability for one fan base to gloat about small power differences. Hence the salt, "suddenly so coveted" LOL. Enjoy the last word, not gonna waste more time with you on this :)

Outside of the top three what are Xbox games really? There's no identity. Nintnedo and Sony fans can tell you what the mission statement of their company of choice is and they continue to deliver because they both have successsful formulas while striving to find new ones. As someone on a podcast said, "it can't be the games"... it has to be the system features.Those are the true exclusives they look for. That said, yes Microsoft does make a great interface.

Ori alone is better than any exclusive I have played on PS4. Just my opinion, you're welcome to disagree. Either way, not going to bother with list warz. You've made countless threads and posts about how crappy you think Microsoft is in this area, no point in trying to change your mind.



Mr Puggsly said:
thismeintiel said:

See, I think a lot of people are going to feel the opposite.  The Scorpio feels unnecessary, since its games are going to PC.  Other than being powerful, it has no identity of its own.  Really, you could say that about Xbox lately.  Probably why sales are dropping so much.  And if MS really tries to sell it for $499, that problem will appear tenfold.  For that, or a little more, you actually could build a decent PC.  

And for being unnecessary, the Pro is actually doing quite well now that it's back in stock.  It beat the top XBO SKU last month on Amazon, and it's looking to do it, again, this month.  You see, the Pro is exactly what it's advertised as, a mid-gen upgrade.  It doesn't need to be much more than twice as powerful because it is being held back by the OG PS4,  as well as its Jaguar cores, something the Scorpio is going to suffer from, too.  It also helps with keeping the price low and with future price cuts.  And in 3 years from its launch, there will be the PS5, to reclaim that suddenly so coveted power crown.  Where MS is going to have to announce they have some new HW just 1 1/2 years after the Scorpio, if they want to keep up with PS.

If you have a gaming PC and Windows 10, you're already in MS's ecosystem. But not everybody is interested in a gaming on PC, its more expensive hardware, so X1 will continue to sell.

We'll get a better idea of how X1 is doing when the year is done. It always has a strong holiday, X1S will likely hit $249, and people are waiting for the Scorpio.

The average console gamer is not building PCs. When somebody suggests this it shows how out of touch they're with the average console gamer.

I'm not sure if Amazon is the best source... but okay. I won't question your anecdotal evidence. PS4 Pro isn't held back by the PS4, because its not a significant upgrade. It struggles to achieve 4K in most games and it rarely pushes a game to 60 fps even at 1080p. That's why its a missed opportunity, it doesn't improve PS4 games enough.

Scorpio made a big upgrade on GPU so it will likely acheive 4K with greater ease. In theory the custom CPU sounds like huge upgrade, but we'll have to see it in practice. The X1 isn't holding Scorpio back, it has the power to make X1 content significantly more polished. Scorpio will be able to boast about having the ports and that's worth something as well. For years we've heard the media has been playing multiplat games on PS4, now they may use Scorpio.

Well I'm certainly curious to see how powerful PS5 will be, hopefully they don't underwhelm like PS4 Pro did. However, Scorpio will atleast have the advantage of being cheaper than PS5. I also suspect Scorpio will share games with the next Xbox.

I have a Windows PC.  You know how much MS makes off of me?  Except for the money they were paid to put Windows on the laptop, nada.  I use Steam and, occassionaly, GOG, as do most PC gamers.  MS sees not one dime of that.  Why do you think they are trying to push Windows Store?  They want some of what Steam, Origin, and GOG has.

The average consumer is also not worried about 6Tflops of power, either.  They are going to be the ones picking up the $199 PS4, with a slight possibility of picking up a Pro, if it is $299, mostly based on price.  They aren't going to be interested in a $499 Scorpio with the other options being much cheaper.  Which is why I'm not talking about the average consumer, but those who are more informed.  And those who are interested in more power are more likely to be skilled enough to build a $499-$549 PC this holiday season with similar GPU performance of a Scorpio, but with a much better CPU.  And it will play every game the Scorpio will.

The Scorpio is also going to have problems hitting 60FPS on more demading games because they went with the same Jaguar cores, only slightly more overclocked than the Pro.  Granted, I don't really care about 60FPS as a standard, nor do most console gamers.  Steady is better.  Whether it be 30FPS or 60FPS.  Still, this isn't going to be some magical 4K60FPS machine.  Is also depends on how well devs bother to push the system.  Sony is in a position to ask devs to push the Pro, is MS? Hardly.  We may see the Scorpio just get Pro ports, some slightly upgraded, if it sells poorly.

Amazon is not the only source, but they have the most available data to the public, and it has been accurate in predicting who would win NPD over 95% of the time this gen.  It is also the largest online retailer, by far.  To have some 3rd party peripheral outselling your #1 console SKU is not good in the least.

As for the PS5, it's going to be a next gen system with all the hype that comes with it.  And Sony is sticking with AMD, most likely, which probably means the 12.5Tflops (probably 11-12Tflops after downclocking for heat) Vega 10, possibly the 15Tflops (~13-14Tflops after downclocking) Vega 20, is what's going in it.  It doesn't matter if the Scorpio is $299 at that point, the PS5 will still have much wider appeal, especially WW.  And actual exclusives to help push it.



Around the Network
LudicrousSpeed said:
thismeintiel said:

We're not the hypocrites who said power doesn't matter and now act like its the end all, be all.  

Power, like B/C, is always nice.  Just like the PS3 days.  But it means jack all without something to back it up and an attractive price.

No salt involved.

Your spin doesn't hold any water when there's not anyone really acting as if it's the end all be all. Not here anyway, I'm speaking to the general Xbox user here at this community. You can be excited about a beast console and yet at the same time not think graphics are everything. But that has zero to do with all the threads and posts we saw about how much power DID matter every time an Xbone game was 900p versus a 1080p PS4 version. But hey, now power is completely irrelevant. Wonder why.

Xbox fans here prefer Xbox for the games, system features like BC and Game Pass, controller, UI, network, etc. Now we still have that, and the most powerful console ever. It's exciting times. The only thing lost here is the ability for one fan base to gloat about small power differences. Hence the salt, "suddenly so coveted" LOL. Enjoy the last word, not gonna waste more time with you on this :)

You mean the general Xbox fan who used to love the 360 vs PS3 comparisons?  Where lack of grass in Mafia 2 was mocked?  The ones who mostly left or stayed quiet because they couldn't stand being on the other side of the argument?  Funny how I haven't seen any PS fans leave because of the Scorpio approaching.  Probably because we feel the same way as before.  Power is great, but means nothing without something to push it or an appealing price/identity. 

And thanks for "permission" to have the last word.  Of course, that doesn't really matter to me.  But, I will say this disscussion is over, even if you feel the need to respond.  Have a nice day. 



sethnintendo said:
Mr Puggsly said:

If you have a gaming PC and Windows 10, you're already in MS's ecosystem.

Not entirely true but somewhat.  I purchased Windows 10 Professional when I built my new PC a few months back but that is all Microsoft is going to see from me.  They might be collecting data on me after turning the share data that they allow you to turn off (I'm sure there is still data being collected without my knowledge or ability to turn off).  That is about all they can expect from me. 

I won't spend a dime on the Windows Store because I'll just stick to a superior store called Steam.  If Valve had converted all the steam games or a majority of them then I would have probably just went with Linux or Steam OS but since only 20 games out of my 100 are available on Linux based system then I'm stuck with Windows.

Again, you have Windows 10 so you're in their ecosystem.

Maybe Windows 10 is spying on you (it likely is), maybe you'll buy some MS games on either Steam or their store, but like it or not you're in the MS ecosystem.

Yeah, you're stuck with Windows. Just be glad it isn't that bad.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

thismeintiel said:
Mr Puggsly said:

If you have a gaming PC and Windows 10, you're already in MS's ecosystem. But not everybody is interested in a gaming on PC, its more expensive hardware, so X1 will continue to sell.

We'll get a better idea of how X1 is doing when the year is done. It always has a strong holiday, X1S will likely hit $249, and people are waiting for the Scorpio.

The average console gamer is not building PCs. When somebody suggests this it shows how out of touch they're with the average console gamer.

I'm not sure if Amazon is the best source... but okay. I won't question your anecdotal evidence. PS4 Pro isn't held back by the PS4, because its not a significant upgrade. It struggles to achieve 4K in most games and it rarely pushes a game to 60 fps even at 1080p. That's why its a missed opportunity, it doesn't improve PS4 games enough.

Scorpio made a big upgrade on GPU so it will likely acheive 4K with greater ease. In theory the custom CPU sounds like huge upgrade, but we'll have to see it in practice. The X1 isn't holding Scorpio back, it has the power to make X1 content significantly more polished. Scorpio will be able to boast about having the ports and that's worth something as well. For years we've heard the media has been playing multiplat games on PS4, now they may use Scorpio.

Well I'm certainly curious to see how powerful PS5 will be, hopefully they don't underwhelm like PS4 Pro did. However, Scorpio will atleast have the advantage of being cheaper than PS5. I also suspect Scorpio will share games with the next Xbox.

I have a Windows PC.  You know how much MS makes off of me?  Except for the money they were paid to put Windows on the laptop, nada.  I use Steam and, occassionaly, GOG, as do most PC gamers.  MS sees not one dime of that.  Why do you think they are trying to push Windows Store?  They want some of what Steam, Origin, and GOG has.

The average consumer is also not worried about 6Tflops of power, either.  They are going to be the ones picking up the $199 PS4, with a slight possibility of picking up a Pro, if it is $299, mostly based on price.  They aren't going to be interested in a $499 Scorpio with the other options being much cheaper.  Which is why I'm not talking about the average consumer, but those who are more informed.  And those who are interested in more power are more likely to be skilled enough to build a $499-$549 PC this holiday season with similar GPU performance of a Scorpio, but with a much better CPU.  And it will play every game the Scorpio will.

The Scorpio is also going to have problems hitting 60FPS on more demading games because they went with the same Jaguar cores, only slightly more overclocked than the Pro.  Granted, I don't really care about 60FPS as a standard, nor do most console gamers.  Steady is better.  Whether it be 30FPS or 60FPS.  Still, this isn't going to be some magical 4K60FPS machine.  Is also depends on how well devs bother to push the system.  Sony is in a position to ask devs to push the Pro, is MS? Hardly.  We may see the Scorpio just get Pro ports, some slightly upgraded, if it sells poorly.

Amazon is not the only source, but they have the most available data to the public, and it has been accurate in predicting who would win NPD over 95% of the time this gen.  It is also the largest online retailer, by far.  To have some 3rd party peripheral outselling your #1 console SKU is not good in the least.

As for the PS5, it's going to be a next gen system with all the hype that comes with it.  And Sony is sticking with AMD, most likely, which probably means the 12.5Tflops (probably 11-12Tflops after downclocking for heat) Vega 10, possibly the 15Tflops (~13-14Tflops after downclocking) Vega 20, is what's going in it.  It doesn't matter if the Scorpio is $299 at that point, the PS5 will still have much wider appeal, especially WW.  And actual exclusives to help push it.

I'm not entirely convinced the only money MS gets is from the Windows license. Either way, you're supporting MS like it or not.

I wouldn't expect a $199 PS4 anytime soon. I'm actually thinking when Pro and Scropio can achieve $249, they will stop making the OG hardware. Hence, midgen upgrades will phase out old specs.

I'm not entirely convinced Scorpio will be $499. We'll see at E3 I guess.

Console CPU aren't extremely powerful, but console games are often better optimized than PC games. I own a fairly capable gaming PC and the X1 does amazing things with little power. So Scorpio's power in the console realm is gonna be impressive.

Again, I'm curious to see what custom CPU in Scorpio is capable of. Its designed to be faster and more efficient. That should help when doing 60 fps. I'm curious to see that in practice.

Frankly, I'm not really even thinking about PS5 right now. All we can do is speculate given we don't know when its coming, the price/power it will aim for, etc. Your expectations might be a bit high if its coming in 2020 and aiming for $399. People argue Scropio has to be $499 right now with dated specs.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Mr Puggsly said:
thismeintiel said:

I have a Windows PC.  You know how much MS makes off of me?  Except for the money they were paid to put Windows on the laptop, nada.  I use Steam and, occassionaly, GOG, as do most PC gamers.  MS sees not one dime of that.  Why do you think they are trying to push Windows Store?  They want some of what Steam, Origin, and GOG has.

The average consumer is also not worried about 6Tflops of power, either.  They are going to be the ones picking up the $199 PS4, with a slight possibility of picking up a Pro, if it is $299, mostly based on price.  They aren't going to be interested in a $499 Scorpio with the other options being much cheaper.  Which is why I'm not talking about the average consumer, but those who are more informed.  And those who are interested in more power are more likely to be skilled enough to build a $499-$549 PC this holiday season with similar GPU performance of a Scorpio, but with a much better CPU.  And it will play every game the Scorpio will.

The Scorpio is also going to have problems hitting 60FPS on more demading games because they went with the same Jaguar cores, only slightly more overclocked than the Pro.  Granted, I don't really care about 60FPS as a standard, nor do most console gamers.  Steady is better.  Whether it be 30FPS or 60FPS.  Still, this isn't going to be some magical 4K60FPS machine.  Is also depends on how well devs bother to push the system.  Sony is in a position to ask devs to push the Pro, is MS? Hardly.  We may see the Scorpio just get Pro ports, some slightly upgraded, if it sells poorly.

Amazon is not the only source, but they have the most available data to the public, and it has been accurate in predicting who would win NPD over 95% of the time this gen.  It is also the largest online retailer, by far.  To have some 3rd party peripheral outselling your #1 console SKU is not good in the least.

As for the PS5, it's going to be a next gen system with all the hype that comes with it.  And Sony is sticking with AMD, most likely, which probably means the 12.5Tflops (probably 11-12Tflops after downclocking for heat) Vega 10, possibly the 15Tflops (~13-14Tflops after downclocking) Vega 20, is what's going in it.  It doesn't matter if the Scorpio is $299 at that point, the PS5 will still have much wider appeal, especially WW.  And actual exclusives to help push it.

I'm not entirely convinced the only money MS gets is from the Windows license. Either way, you're supporting MS like it or not.

I wouldn't expect a $199 PS4 anytime soon. I'm actually thinking when Pro and Scropio can achieve $249, they will stop making the OG hardware. Hence, midgen upgrades will phase out old specs.

I'm not entirely convinced Scorpio will be $499. We'll see at E3 I guess.

Console CPU aren't extremely powerful, but console games are often better optimized than PC games. I own a fairly capable gaming PC and the X1 does amazing things with little power. So Scorpio's power in the console realm is gonna be impressive.

Again, I'm curious to see what custom CPU in Scorpio is capable of. Its designed to be faster and more efficient. That should help when doing 60 fps. I'm curious to see that in practice.

Frankly, I'm not really even thinking about PS5 right now. All we can do is speculate given we don't know when its coming, the price/power it will aim for, etc. Your expectations might be a bit high if its coming in 2020 and aiming for $399. People argue Scropio has to be $499 right now with dated specs.

Well, they can enjoy my $50 over the next 3+ years before I get another laptop.

The PS4 will be $199 this year, at least during Black Friday and, most likely, some other period during the holidays.  Sony is continuing with gens.  And regardless of what MS says, I imagine they will, too.  This means that the Pro may stay on the market slightly longer than the OG PS4, but PS4 games will still be made with the OG PS4 in mind. 

I'm sure the CPU will be more capable than the Pro, but I imagine that is more to do with the overclocking than any radical change to the Jaguar cores.  There's a reason MS is pushing the clock so high.  And it's not because they customized the cores to get much more power per Hz than the Pro.  Just don't expect a 30FPS-40FPS game on the Pro to run at 60FPS on the Scorpio.  Probably be more like 45FPS.  Games that are closer to 60FPS,  like 50FPS-55FPS, on the Pro will probably hit it on the Scorpio, though.  At least more consistently.

As for price, that is what DF is proposing as the price.  Considering MS went to them to reveal the console, it sounds like they may have hinted at the price.  Probably had them "speculate" it to get the idea of it being $499 out there.  See how it sits with gamers.  We may see them try to hit $449, saying, "See, it's not as much as you thought it would be."  However, given they have said a few times it is a premium console for a premium price, it definitely doesn't seem like they are aiming at $399.

I expect the PS5 in 2019, 6 years after the PS4 launched.  As for specs, they are actually in line with making a $399 console.  The Ryzen 1700 is already out and is a much better CPU than the Jaguar.  It goes for $325 right now.  By the end of 2019, it will be at least 50% cheaper, most likely a little more.  So, ~$150 at retail.  That means Sony could probably buy them in bulk for ~$100.  At maximum, the Vega 10 is going to launch for $500 this year.  By 2019, it'll be $250, so Sony can get them for ~$200.  That brings us to just $300.  That's still ~$100 to play with RAM, motherboard, cooling, and casing.  Of course, given that the RX480 was only $200 at launch, I could see the Vega being cheaper, like $300-$400.  And keep in mind, Sony is fine with taking a loss on HW, initially.  So, they may just decide to go with a Vega 20 to make sure they have enough power to be ~2.5x the Scorpio, and not just 2x.  Either way, prices are going to fall relatively quick, which will allow them to be profitable on HW within a year or so.



VGPolyglot said:
LipeJJ said:

I'm yet to see a hardware launch with 5 major exclusive games...

I'm not sure why it's even being counted really as it's a beefed up XB1.

Exactly. It's not like the PS4 Pro or the New 3DS received major exclusive games. The same will follow with XB1 Scorpio, it's just an updated/enhanced version of an existing console.



Bet with Teeqoz for 2 weeks of avatar and sig control that Super Mario Odyssey would ship more than 7m on its first 2 months. The game shipped 9.07m, so I won